Novel Lactobacillus Living Body Activating Lactobacillus Preparation and Preventive or Therapeutic Agent for Living Body Infection
专利汇可以提供Novel Lactobacillus Living Body Activating Lactobacillus Preparation and Preventive or Therapeutic Agent for Living Body Infection专利检索，专利查询，专利分析的服务。并且There has been effort to develop a lactobacillus that would be useful as a probiotic, and to develop a lactobacillus which would colonize and proliferate in lesions of infection, eliminating the causal bacteria.This problem was resolved by developing a Lactobacillus casei species having the following key properties. (1) The species can be grown in the presence of any of one to four amino acids as a nitrogen source necessary for growth. (2) When a growth-promoting culture medium is inoculated with the species and Escherichia coli in the same count and subjected to anaerobic mixed culturing at 37° C., the final count of lactobacilli is 50% or more of the coliform count. (3) Upon cultivation in an appropriate culture medium, the final pH value is 4.0 or below, and the highest acidity is 1.5% or more. (4) The species is resistant to 5% bile salts. (5) The species produces an antibiotic.，下面是Novel Lactobacillus Living Body Activating Lactobacillus Preparation and Preventive or Therapeutic Agent for Living Body Infection专利的具体信息内容。
The present invention relates to a Lactobacillus casei species having excellent properties not provided by conventionally known bacteria, to a living body activating lactobacillus preparation having this bacteria as a principal component which is extremely useful for restoring, maintaining and promoting health and for improving the growth and quality of plants and animals, and to a lactobacillus preparation which is highly effective in preventing and treating infections of animals and plants.
An infection occurs when bacteria invade and multiply inside a living body and the body exhibits disease symptoms, and once bacteria begin to multiply in the body, the body reacts in a variety of ways, and various symptoms such as redness and swelling appear. Use of drugs such as antibiotics is appropriate at this point, and helps to cure the infection. However, when it is too late to use antibiotics, or when their use is inappropriate, or when use is interrupted in the course of therapy, or when enough of the drug cannot get to the infection, reduction or removal of the pathogen is prevented and treatment is ultimately unsuccessful in many cases. In addition, problems have recently risen affecting both the bacteria and their hosts, complicating circumstances so that infections last longer or are more severe and difficult to treat.
The first victory for humans in the war against infectious disease occurred in the mid-twentieth century with the advent of antibiotics, beginning with penicillin. Unlike previous drugs, this drug was hailed as a “magic bullet” for its dramatic effects: it seemed that infection had been conquered, and that the term “infectious disease” would soon be obsolete. Bacteria are not easily conquered, however, and overuse of antibiotics led to the appearance and spread of drug-resistant bacteria. Having survived and regrouped, the bacteria are on the attack again. Bacteria that have acquired resistance have succeeded in transmitting this resistance across species boundaries through the conjugation of special DNA fragments (resistance genes) called R-plasmids. As a result, medicine truly seems to be on the brink of defeat due to the prevalence and spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a major cause of hospital-based infections, and other multidrug-resistant bacteria including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Shigella flexneri and the like.
For example, 80% of adults are said to suffer from periodontal disease, in which surrounding tissues that support the teeth including the gums, cement, periodontal ligaments, alveolar bone and the like become inflamed and are gradually destroyed. This is caused by bacteria that preferentially colonize and form plaque in the periodontal tissue, particularly grooves in the cervical part at the boundary between the teeth and gums. The gums become locally inflamed due to toxins and enzymes produced by these bacteria, resulting in gingivitis, and as this progresses gum pockets form where plaque accumulates, resulting in periodontitis. As the symptoms progress the pockets deepen and widen, inflammation spreads to and gradually destroys the roots of the teeth, which sooner or later fall out. Specifically, in the initial stages of periodontal disease the gums of the cervical part to which plaque has attached itself become red and swollen, losing their elasticity and bleeding during brushing. If this is ignored, the plaque gradually grows and forms calculus, spreading open the cervical area to form periodontal pockets. The calculus forms a barrier which prevents brushing of the underlying plaque, so that the bacteria gain force and their toxins cause the pockets to grow larger and larger, and the inflammation spreads from the gums to the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone, causing bleeding and pus with halitosis while at the same time the infection spreads one by one to the surrounding teeth. If inflammation of the pockets becomes chronic, the alveolar bone which supports the roots of the teeth begins to dissolve from the surface, accompanied by edema of the gums, the teeth wobble and feel loose because they are not properly supported, and strong halitosis occurs along with pain when the patient bites down hard. As the disease progresses most of the alveolar bone is lost, the roots of the teeth are exposed, the teeth become looser so that the patient can no longer eat hard foods, and finally the teeth fall out one by one. Consequently, experts recognize periodontal disease as a classic model of a chronic infectious disease that is still hard to cure.
Another problem concerns the drugs themselves: drugs are foreign to the body and produce side-effects to a greater or lesser degree, and experts point out that the more effective the drug, the greater the side-effects. In general it is said that the effects of drugs are halved while the side effects are doubled in the elderly—a fact that cannot be ignored considering the aging of society. The stronger and stronger demands for safety and security from society as a whole also cannot be ignored. Accidental deaths from side effects continue to occur. Antibiotics are no exception, in fact producing much stronger blood toxicity than other drugs including the allergic reaction called “penicillin shock” as well as leucopenia, anemia and the like, and the resulting loss of immune strength has been recognized at public institutions. Because antibiotics are so useful, however, this has not been much of a problem except in actual cases of severe illness or death.
Antibiotics have another side effect which is not immediately obvious: they attack the intestinal flora, which is sometimes called a vital organ, causing microbial substitution. That is, immune function is further depressed by the synergistic effect of blood toxicity combined with a decrease in beneficial intestinal bacteria that are highly sensitive to antibiotics, promoting chronic infections and leading to new viral diseases and other infections. In fact, the bacteria which cause typical chronic infections such as periodontal disease, sinusitis, hemorrhoids and the like are often antibiotic resistant, and side effects accumulate while the drug is ineffective. Even without resistance, the more an antibiotic is used, the greater the risk of mutation into resistant strains. On the individual level, continuous exposure to toxins from pathogenic bacteria can be fatal when combined with decreased immune function, while on a societal level resistant bacteria have crossed national boundaries to cause unanticipated harm throughout the world.
Looking at the United States and Europe, the idea of creating bodies which do not become sick rather than treating them when they become sick (preventive medicine) has been in force for over a decade, and one effective means for this when has been accepted because of its safety is “probiotics,” which borrows the help of beneficial bacteria.
Research into Lactobacillus was started in France by Pasteur, the father of modern microbiology, leading to the “prolongation of life” theory of the Russian Metchinikoff and many subsequent clinical applications, but it still has not been put into true practical use. This is because the results of epidemiological studies have not matched the results of experimental research. Recently, however, advances in intestinal bacteriology have shown that Lactobacillus has the following important roles.
(1) Immune function normalization: Normalizes and enhances the immune function, which is indispensable for maintaining life
(2) Intestinal cleansing: Balances the intestinal flora, suppresses proliferation of harmful bacteria, and suppresses abnormal fermentation and production of harmful bacteria in the intestines
(3) Blood cleansing: cleanses the blood as an extension of the intestinal cleansing function
(4) Promotion of food utilization: Promotes synthesis of vitamins and amino acids; aids absorption of nutrients through the intestinal walls
(5) Prevention of infections by harmful bacteria: prevents proliferation and infection in the intestine even if harmful bacteria invade from the outside
(6) Cell normalization: Promotes normalization of cell functions
In Japan as well, as society ages and controlling health costs becomes a national concern, the importance of disease prevention is being recognized and society as a whole is becoming more concerned with health. As a result, the number of products containing Lactobacillus as an ingredient is rising steadily, and more and more so-called “functional yoghurt” products are being developed. However, the truth is that if these product are consumed intermittently, effects such as those mentioned in (1) through (6) above and other definite effects on disease will be few and far between, while actual effectiveness against infection would seem to be a fool's hope.
Under these circumstance, the inventors proposed that a lactic acid bacillus having unique properties which was isolated and selected by the inventors in May of 2000 be used against infections with the aim of resolving the ill effects of conventional antibiotics such as drug-resistant bacteria, drug allergies, side-effects and problems affecting ordinary bacterial flora, and submitted a patent application for a “New Lactic Acid Bacterium Effective on Infectious Disease and Lactobacillus Preparation Comprising Lactic Acid Bacterium as Main Ingredient” (Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2001-333766).
This application relates to a lactic acid bacillus which is a Lactobacillus casei species that not only acts to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria but also produces “novel bioactive substances” which have the property of weakening the toxicity of pathogenic bacteria, and to a Lactobacillus preparation for acute and chronic infections which has this bacterium as a main component. In detail, of the Lactobacillus casei collected from nature we selected only those strains producing a broad-spectrum antibiotic, and then screened for hemolytic and S-R mutations, with confirmation through animal testing, to determine whether or not that antibiotic weakened the toxicity of pathogenic bacteria, and finally three strains of Lactobacillus casei which met the criteria, FERM BP-6771, FERM BP-6772 and FERM BP-6773, were applied to infections. These were also given resistance to widely-used antibiotics so that they could be used in combination with those antibiotics. In cases of acute infections such as acute colitis, acute cystitis, acute bronchitis and the like, faster treatment effects were achieved through use of these Lactobacilli in conjunction with antibiotic administration than were achieved with conventional antibiotics alone, including (i) reduced antibiotic dosage, (ii) quicker amelioration of symptoms and faster recovery with fewer side-effects, and (iii) less disturbance of the intestinal flora, and the ill effects from the drug were reduced. However, the effects took time to appear and a complete cure was not achieved in the case of chronic infections such as gingivitis, sinusitis, bronchitis and hemorrhoids.
As discussed above, the issue is to grow a Lactobacillus casei capable of colonizing and multiplying in the lesions of a chronic infection that resists treatment, and of providing a strong cleansing action while eliminating the causal bacteria.
As a result of exhaustive research aimed at resolving the aforementioned issues, the inventors succeeded in achieving this goal from hints obtained by looking at the vaginal cleansing system, which maintains a clean environment even while being constantly exposed to bacterial contamination.
That is, this is a Lactobacillus casei species having the properties described in (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) below, which is preferably the Lactobacillus casei species FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443):
(1) The species can be grown in the presence of any of one to four amino acids as a nitrogen source necessary for growth;
(2) When a growth-promoting culture medium is inoculated with the species and Escherichia coli in the same count and subjected to anaerobic mixed culturing at 37° C., the final count of lactobacilli is 50% or more of the coliform count;
(3) Upon cultivation in an appropriate culture medium, the final pH value is 4.0 or below, and the highest acidity is 1.5% or more;
(4) The species is resistant to 5% bile salts;
(5) The species produces an antibiotic.
Secondly, the present invention is a Lactobacillus casei species having at least one of the following properties in addition to the properties listed above, and this Lactobacillus casei species is FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443):
(a) Has resistance to widely-used antibiotics;
(b) Has amylolytic ability;
(c) Promotes the growth of chlorella;
(d) Grows at temperatures in the range of 5° C. to 45° C.;
(e) Grows at pH values in the range of pH 4.0 to pH 10.0;
(f) Can also grow under any oxygen pressure.
Thirdly, the present invention is a living body activating lactobacillus preparation having the Lactobacillus casei species described above as a primary active ingredient, wherein the aforementioned Lactobacillus casei species is FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443).
Fourthly, the present invention is a preventative or therapeutic agent for living body infection having the Lactobacillus casei species described above as a main primary ingredient, which preferably contains an antibiotic, and which is preferably applied to an affected area in the treatment of periodontal disease after the affected area is already disinfected with a bactericidal disinfectant, wherein said bactericidal disinfectant preferably contains 500 to 1,500 ppm of ferric ions, 500 to 2,000 ppm of L-ascorbic acid and 200 to 2,000 ppm of one or at least two of sorbic acid, benzoic acid and paraoxybenzoic acid ester as principal components, and said Lactobacillus casei species is preferably FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443).
At present, society as a whole values safety and security over all else, and in health and medicine the concept of “probiotics” has taken center stage in the West in particular. “Probiotics” refers to the use of bacteria and other microorganisms which are symbiotic organisms that live in the intestines and are beneficial to the body, and to methods of aggressively preventing and treating disease using such bacteria, especially the internal use of lactobacilli including Lactobacillus bifidus and the like.
The inventors in this case quickly made use of this to develop the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention, which consists of a Lactobacillus casei species that has been given unique properties. At the cutting edge of probiotics, this preparation not only has very clear effects in restoring, maintaining and promoting health, but has also succeeded in providing therapeutic effects not provided by conventional products of the same type with respect to chronic cases of infection that are difficult to treat even by modern medicine. Moreover, because the lactobacillus of the present invention is resistant to antibiotics, more rapid treatment can be achieved in combination with antibiotics. In this case, the minimum dosage of antibiotic is sufficient, and the various intrinsic ill effects of the drug such as side effects and spreading of drug-resistant bacteria can be reduced. In addition, in the context of increases in the degenerative diseases of an aging society and increases in chronic infections due to aging, along with the inevitable increase in medical costs, the role of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention as a means of resolving these problems will be more and more important in the future.
Before the advent of antibiotics, very few efforts were made anywhere in the world to treat periodontal disease. The bacteria within the lesions of periodontal disease were also though to be a cause of heart disease and other fatal disease, and because of this perceived danger teeth with bad cavities or periodontal disease were pulled without hesitation. Because of this theory dentistry long consisted not of treatment for disease but of tooth pulling and dealing with the effects of tooth pulling through dentures. This situation began to improve with the advent of antibiotics, and in the nineteen-eighties research into periodontal disease pathogens allowed the progress of the disease to be better understood. This led to fundamental therapy to remove plaque and calculus, with the result that inflammation subsided, periodontal pockets became shallower, loose teeth were aligned and no longer wobbled, and when this was not successful surgery was done on the gums. In this way, therapeutic strategies were developed to preserve the teeth. On the other hand, the intractability of periodontal disease was re-evaluated when it was found that bacteria hidden inside the gums form special collective structures and barriers, reducing the pharmaceutical effects of antibacterial and bactericidal drugs, and that patient lifestyle habits, systemic conditions and genetic factors are also involved in the occurrence and progress of the disease. Perhaps out of a sense of futility, there has been little progress in the past decade in the basic study and treatment of periodontal disease.
With the arrival of a long-lived society, experts have gradually disclosed a close association between the teeth and physical health, realizing that the teeth serve not only a chewing function but also are central to life itself, and society has come to realize that to prevent dementia, cancer, stroke, heart disease and the like it is important to treat teeth in order to bring out the body's natural healing powers and enhance systemic functions. That is, it was realized that the teeth are irreplaceable organs, and that by means of the teeth it is possible to improve physical and psychological functions, prevent aging and improve human happiness. Tooth loss and cavities and the implantation of imperfect artificial teeth to replace them may lead to continuous and cumulative stress reactions in the living body. With the current focus on side effects and drug problems, the development of the safe preventative agent and therapeutic agent of the present invention, which places little physical, psychological or financial burden on either doctor or patient, holds great promise for revolutionizing the treatment of periodontal disease, which is often derided as “mop-up” treatment, and is bound to be good news for the human race as we aim for society in which it is natural to keep one's teeth.
In place of the disinfectants and antibiotics which have been widely used in the treatment process, the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention, which has unique properties and high affinity for mucous membranes, in combination with a bactericidal disinfectant (U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,881B1) developed by the inventors which is gentle to mucous membranes but has severe effects on pathogenic bacteria, is an excellent preventative agent and therapeutic agent for periodontal disease, capable of effecting an almost complete cure in cases of periodontal disease from the early stages to the late stages regardless of the technical abilities of the dentist as long as there is alveolar bone left to support the teeth. Moreover, the therapeutic agent for periodontal disease of the present invention can be administered in addition to conventional treatments for periodontal disease.
Moreover, animal growth can be promoted by the administration of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention during the rearing of pigs, chickens, mackerel, insects and other animals, contributing to improved quality and disease prevention, and it exhibits strong therapeutic effects against a variety of diseases including Saproglenia infection and ulcer disease in goldfish.
Moreover, growth can be promoted and higher quality obtained by applying the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention to plants including strawberries, spinach and other vegetables and herbs. In addition to preventing disease occurrence it is also effective in treating plant diseases such as powdery mildew and downy mildew in cucumbers.
The appearance of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention breaths fresh air into the conventional fixed concept of treating infections with antibiotics or agricultural chemicals, and is bound to contribute greatly to the future recognition and development of “probiotics”.
Lactobacilli are widely present in nature, from the intestines, oral cavity and other parts of the living body to tree leaves, grass, crops, fruits, soil and sewage, and are found abundantly in all places of living activity. As a result, they have been used as a matter of course in food processing and preservation since ancient times when people were not even aware of their existence, while nowadays the role of lactobacilli is appreciated from a scientific perspective and they have gained attention as probiotics.
The inventors have gone one step further to develop a lactobacillus having high affinity for the living body and excellent cleansing abilities that were not heretofore available. We have shown that this bacterium is not only effective in preventing and treating disease, but also contributes greatly to improving the growth and quality of animals and plants. Hence, its industrial applicability is thought to extend not only to primary industry but also to the health industry as a whole in the general sense and to the cosmetic industry as an extension of the health industry, and it can be used and applied widely in the food industry or generally in all environments required for human life.
The Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention may be in the form of cell bodies obtained by culture, a culture liquid or a decontaminated culture filtrate, while the preparation containing a novel Lactobacillus casei may be a preparation containing only the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention or a preparation containing the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention along with an antibiotic.
The Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention was developed with reference to the existence of lactobacilli normally present in the vagina. That is, Doederlein's bacillus, which is normally present in the vagina, breaks down the glycogens exuding from the vaginal wall, producing lactic acid which maintains acidity and prevents the proliferation of putrefactive bacteria invading from the outside, and thus plays a vital role in maintaining cleanliness. This bacterium is very similar to Lactobacillus acidophilus, and when its growth is suppressed by antibiotics or the like yeasts and other bacteria are known to proliferate and may cause various inflammations. That is, an infection-prevention system is constructed the mainstay of which is a lactobacillus which can establish itself and proliferate with a small amount of nutrition in the vagina. This cleansing system seems to be a basic and common one considering that intractable hemorrhoids clear up naturally if the intestinal flora comes to consist mainly of beneficial bacteria.
Based on these findings, the inventors perfected the present invention by collecting as many lactobacillus digestive aids and commercial lactobacillus products as possible and studying the strains in them, when they discovered that only those bacterial strains meeting certain conditions had 100% of their original overt or latent abilities and could fundamentally activate the living bodies of animals and plants, with economic effects on their growth and quality, as well as increasing the immune system (natural healing ability) against disease while at the same time strongly excluding causal bacteria in cases of infection.
Of the conditions to be met by the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention, the first essential condition is that (1) the nutrient demand be much less than that of known conventional Lactobacillus casei. That is, this means that the species can be grown in the presence of any of one, two, three or four amino acids as a nutrient nitrogen source. (2) proliferation is rapid in the growth environment. This means that when a growth-promoting culture medium is inoculated with the species and Escherichia coli in the same amount and subjected to anaerobic mixed culture at 37° C., the final count of lactobacilli is 50% or more of the coliform count. (3) Lactic acid production ability is high. This means that upon cultivation in an appropriate culture medium, the final pH value is 4.0 or below, and the highest acidity is 1.5% or more. (4) The species has high resistance to bile acids. This means that the species is resistant to 5% bile salts. (5) The species produces an antibiotic and can inhibit the proliferation of other bacteria.
More preferably, the species (a) has resistance to widely-used antibiotics; (b) has amylolytic ability; (c) promotes the growth of chlorella; (d) has a wide range of growth temperatures (grows at temperatures in the range of 5° C. to 45° C.); (e) has a wide range of growth pH values (grows at pH values in the range of pH 4.0 to pH 10.0); and (f) has a wide range of oxygen pressure at which it can grow (that is, it can grow under any oxygen pressure).
Therefore, the inventors acclimated the Lactobacillus casei species FERM BP-6971, FERM BP 6972 and FERM BP-6973 (hereunder, “original Lactobacillus casei species), for which a patent application has already been submitted, and after much effort dedicated to conferring the aforementioned properties, succeeded in producing a bacterial strain meeting the conditions of the present invention from FERM BP-6971 by the process described below.
To have an effect on a living body, a bacterium must adapt to its environment, prevail in growth competition with pathogenic bacteria and adequately reproduce itself. A necessary condition for this is the production of an antibiotic which suppresses the growth of other bacteria, and before that the basic potential or in other words the proliferative potency of the bacteria must be strong. In general lactobacilli have high nutrient demands, and for example the MRS medium widely used for bacterial growth is composed of 10 g of meat extract, 5 g of yeast extract, 10 g of peptone, 0.2 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 0.5 g of MnSO4.5H2O, 5 g of sodium acetate, 2 g of diammonium citrate, 2 g of KH2PO4 and 20 g of glucose per liter. The Lactobacillus casei of the present invention is not an exception, but since it is a Lactobacillus casei isolated from nature its original nutrient demands are moderate, and it can proliferate with appropriate concentrations of amino acids, vitamins, usable sugars and inorganic salts, such as for example a medium consisting of S-W medium plus 1 g casamino acids and 0.1 g vitamins. S-W medium itself contains 1 g of KH2PO4, 0.7 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 1 g of NaCl, 4 g of (NH4)2HPO4, 0.03 g of FeSO4.7H2O and 5 g of glucose per liter. Plate medium was prepared with this composition, and the original Lactobacillus casei species dispersed in sterilized sodium chloride solution was applied thereto and cultured anaerobically for 48 to 72 hours at 37° C. The largest of the resulting colonies were selected, harvested, and cultured again by the same procedures as above, and the operation of selecting and harvesting the colonies as they grew was repeated to obtain the strain with the fastest growth and proliferation in this medium composition. Next, a strain with good growth was selected by repeating the same operation with ½ the nutrient concentration in the medium, after which colonies which grew in medium with the nutrient concentration gradually reduced to ¼, ⅛ and 1/16 were identified in order to obtain a strain with the ability to grow and to proliferate rapidly in environments of extremely low nutrition.
Conventional known Lactobacillus casei including the original Lactobacillus casei species require a variety of amino acids as nitrogen sources for growth, but the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention can grow with any one amino acid or with 2, 3 or 4 amino acids as a nitrogen source. An example would be inorganic salts plus sugar plus vitamins plus L(+)-lysine hydrochloride plus L-glutamic acid. When grown together with Escherichia coli, a bacteria which like Lactobacillus casei is a familiar bacteria which grows everywhere in nature and which is known as an indicator species of environmental contamination, the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention was not inferior to Escherichia coli in terms of extent and speed of growth in the initial and middle stages, and the final count of lactobacilli was 50% or more of the coliform count. When this ratio of the bacteria is 30% or less, a bacterial strain can have little effect on a living body however great its abilities.
Next, another important property needed to prevail in growth competition with other bacteria is the ability to suppress the growth of other bacteria in an environment of reduced pH. This means a bacterial strain with strong lactic acid production ability. In particular, lactic acid produced in the digestive system protects the body from the invasion and proliferation of various pathogenic bacteria from outside, and secondarily encourages peristalsis in the intestines, promoting the excretion of waste products from the intestines and suppressing the production of putrefaction products. It has been shown experimentally that a final pH of 4.0 or less and a maximum acidity of 1.5% or more is one important condition for increasing the functions of lactobacilli. However, in the case of most known Lactobacillus casei the final pH does not reach 4.2 or less and the highest acidity is less than 1.5%. One example of a rearing method for enhancing lactic acid productivity is to culture the bacteria anaerobically for 48 to 72 hours at 37° C. in an opaque medium consisting of 3 g of CaCO3 added to the medium described above which contains 10 g of meat extract, 5 g of yeast extract, 10 g of peptone, 0.2 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 0.5 g of MnSO4.5H2O, 5 g of sodium acetate, 2 g of diammonium citrate, 2 g of KH2PO4 and 20 g of glucose per liter, linking the colonies, and repeatedly selecting those with the widest transparent rings around them. This makes use of the fact that when lactic acid is produced the opaque calcium carbonate binds to the lactic acid and changes to calcium lactate.
The digestive tract is connected to the outside via a single tube, and one reason why bacteria living in the harsh environment of the outside world do not establish themselves and proliferate in the nutrient-rich, gentle environment of the intestines has to do with the presence of bile acids secreted by the gall bladder. Consequently, most isolation and selection media for intestinal bacteria have bile acids added to the composition in order to suppress the growth of other bacteria. According to the inventors' findings, when the concentration of bile acids such as sodium deoxycholate reaches 0.1%, intestinal bacteria continue to grow but most bacteria which do not live in the intestines do not grow. The original Lactobacillus casei species was capable of growing up to a bile acid concentration of 0.2%, but the conclusion was reached partly for the following reasons that activity in the body required growth at a bile acid concentration of 0.5%. Consequently, a bacterial strain was reared by ordinary method for resistance to bile salts. That is, we began by adding 0.2% bile acids to high-nutrient medium such as the lactic acid selection medium LBS and proliferation medium MRS, and increased the bile acid concentration in stages to 0.5% as the bacteria grew. Once a resistant strain had been obtained it was shown to maintain its resistance regardless of the type of medium, and it was also shown for the first time in these experiments that bile acid resistance correlates with mucous membrane affinity. That is, as bile acid resistance increases or in other words as affinity for bile acids increases the bacteria become increasingly capable of colonizing mucous membranes outside the intestines, such as the oral cavity, nasal mucous membrane, vagina and the like.
The ability to produce antibiotics that impede the survival of other bacteria is also important. The original Lactobacillus casei produces a broad-spectrum antibiotic that not only impedes the growth of other bacteria but has also been reported to weaken the toxicity of pathogenic bacteria, and the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention retains this ability. Moreover, the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention needs to be resistant to widely used antibiotics, but the original Lactobacillus casei is antibiotic resistant, and the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention retains this ability.
The ability to use starches abundantly present throughout the natural world as energy sources is desirable for colonization, survival and proliferation in living bodies. However, most Lactobacillus casei are not amylolytic, or only weakly so. The original Lactobacillus casei species is no exception and lacks amylolytic ability, but through the process of acclimatization it was possible to confer high amylolytic ability without affecting the ability to break down glucose and lactose, resulting in the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention. One example of a rearing method for enhancing amylolytic ability is to add 4.5 g of glucose and 0.5 g of starch (starch 10% of sugars) to a medium- to low-nutrient medium with a pH of 7.4 consisting of 1 g of meat extract, 1 g of yeast extract, 3 g of peptone, 1 g of NaCl, 0.5 g of K2HPO4, 0.5 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 0.05 g of MnSO4.5H2O, 1 g of sodium acetate, 0.5 g of diammonium citrate and 12 ml of 0.2% BTB per liter, and then culture anaerobically for 48 hours at 37° C. Subculturing is then repeated in medium of the same composition, and if even a little amylolysis is confirmed the percentage of starch is then raised to 20%. In this way, the starch percentage of the sugars is raised to 100% as subculturing is repeated, and the ability to break down starch is rapidly acquired in the same way as for glucose. In any medium, the pH decreases as sugars are broken down to produce acids, and the color of the medium changes from blue to yellow. It is important to keep subculturing until the depth of yellow of the medium with starch added is the same as with 100% glucose. Fortunately, most bacteria that cause chronic infections are incapable of obtaining energy from the breakdown of starch, so giving the Lactobacillus casei species this ability is particularly effective as a measure against infections.
Chlorella is a single-celled plant with strong vitality that has continued to photosynthesize and produce generations through repeated cell division for more than a billion years on this planet, and is seen as the ancestor of a variety of living plants. That is, it can be said that chlorella is the original form and source of life on earth. If a lactobacillus promotes the growth and proliferation of chlorella, it means that the substances produced by this lactobacillus activate and having a restorative effect on living cells, so obviously they should also be effective for living bodies which are accumulations of cells. It has been known for decades that the metabolic products of chlorella promote the proliferation of lactobacilli, but it has heretofore not been reported that conversely, the metabolic products of lactobacilli stimulate the proliferation of chlorella. Consequently, as an example of a rearing method for increasing the ability to promote growth of chlorella, a medium with a pH of 6.8 consisting of 5 g peptone, 2 g meat extract, 5 g glucose, 5 g yeast extract, 2 g KNO3, 2 g K2HPO4, 0.1 g MgSO4.7H2O, 0.1 g CaCl2.2H2O, 0.1 g NaCl, 0.01 g MnSO4.5H2O, 0.05 g ZnSO4.5H2O, 3 g CaCO3 and 15 g agar per liter was sterilized under high pressure for 15 minutes at 120° C. and cooled to about 50° C. after sterilization, a suitable amount of pure-cultured chlorella was added and mixed uniformly, and the mixture was poured into Petri dishes. Following 48 to 72 hours of pre-culture in a lighted incubator at 28° C., the original Lactobacillus casei species dispersed in sterilized saline solution was applied to the medium and subcultured aerobically and anaerobically (a few % CO2) at 28° C. to 32° C. with light. This was observed every 24 hours to determine whether chlorella around the proliferating colonies of Lactobacillus casei was proliferating more densely than in the other areas. Colonies exhibiting even the slightest such tendency were repeatedly harvested to prepare the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention which promotes the growth of chlorella.
A wide range of possible oxygen pressures, temperatures and pH values for growth is also a desirable condition for adapting and competing successfully in harsh environments, and this can be achieved by an ordinary acclimatization method with the selection of an appropriate medium.
The differences among known, conventional Lactobacillus casei, the original Lactobacillus casei species and the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention are shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, because the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention which was screened by selection and acclimatization has unique properties not present in known Lactobacillus casei or in the original Lactobacillus casei species, when used in a living body the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention may not only provide dramatic effects not obtained from the various lactic acid products jostling each other on food shelves and health food shelves, but may act quite clearly to restore, maintain and increase health and to produce economic effects such as quality improvement and the like when used in plants and animals, and may be quite effective against infections. The lactobacillus preparation of the present invention can thus be called a living body activating lactobacillus preparation or a preventative or therapeutic agent against infection in animals and plants.
The plaque which is the cause of periodontal disease is said to be an accumulation of about 400 types of bacteria, of which the most pathogenic for periodontal disease have been shown to be Poryphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, with Walinella recta, Bacteroides forsythus, Eikenella corrodens, Fusobacteria, Treponema and the like being involved as accessories. The specificity of the periodontal disease is the biggest factor that makes it hard to cure this disease. Because the teeth are directly connected to the inside of the body, when an inflammatory reaction is severe the body does not try to heal the periodontal disease but instead forms deep grooves at the boundaries between the teeth and gums, destroying the tissue supporting the teeth and sacrificing the teeth to protect the body like a lizard which lives with its tail cut off. In other words, it is not an external enemy that destroys the tissue supporting the teeth but the inflammation itself, which is a means of protecting the body from the external enemy. Tooth roots which have been contaminated and penetrated by bacterial toxins and enzymes are not recognized as self by the body, which acts to exclude them as causative factors together with surrounding tissue. That is, a curative reaction actually exacerbates the periodontal disease. Consequently, once all the teeth affected with periodontal disease fall out, the disease clears up completely.
Other factors include (1) the fact that the oral cavity is a suitable environment for the growth and proliferation of bacteria, and is difficult to keep clean, and bacteria with strong periodontal pathogenicity in particular adhere strongly to the teeth and gums by producing sticky glucans, fructans and other insoluble polysaccharides, substances which also serve as a barrier to protect the periodontal pathogens, (2) the fact that since the toxins and enzymes which they produce penetrate inconspicuously into periodontal tissue, the disease progresses with few subjective symptoms, and the appearance of symptoms is not uniform but involves a variety of factors including soiling around the teeth, inflammation, gum retraction, aging and the like, while once gum pockets have formed they generally do not close which in combination with (1) above leads to repeated re-occurrence, (3) the fact that few dentists undertake therapy using appropriate drugs in cooperation with specialists in bacteriology, (4) the fact that both doctors and patients assume that in the worst case the teeth can be pulled, and (5) the fact that periodontal disease is not a local problem but a systemic disease often involving for example diabetes and other endocrine disorders, genetic disorders, stress, osteoporosis, circulatory disorders and the like, and cannot be completely cured simply by symptomatic therapy. Periodontal disease involves many detrimental factors, and is considered incurable unless treatment is started in the early stages.
At present, the primary form of early therapy is treatment such as scaling and root planning to remove the plaque and calculus, which are hotbeds of periodontal disease. Supragingival calculus adhering to the surfaces of teeth above the gum line is relatively easy to remove, but subgingival calculus adhering to the surfaces (roots) of teeth below the gum line is dense and hard, blackish-green in color and strongly adhesive, and the bacteria and their toxins cannot be easily removed simply by brushing. Consequently, methods have recently been adopted of destroying it efficiently with ultrasound or lasers or dissolving it with special chemicals. After that, a disinfectant or antibiotic is injected and fixed in the periodontal pocket until the inflammation clears up. However, when the site of inflammation is deep and the aforementioned therapy does not produce favorable results, the site of inflammation or damage is removed by surgery. Subsequently, the gums are sewn up or reconstructed with artificial material. More recent techniques include surgery according to GTR (guided tissue regeneration) methods and application of a type of protein called Emdogain as an adjunct to surgery to recreate an environment similar to the tooth regeneration process and encourage the regeneration of periodontal tissue, but these are not effective against all advanced cases of periodontal disease, and their application is limited. In any case, at present basic treatment for periodontal disease is aimed at controlling inflammation of the gums, arresting the progress of the periodontal disease, regenerating lost periodontal tissue, improving external appearance and maintained newly regained tissue, but as mentioned above periodontal disease also involves systemic risk factors, and unfortunately at present there is no therapy which is effective enough to be a favorite, and many dentists are content if they can keep the situation from getting worse.
The bactericidal disinfectant discussed in the present invention (hereunder, “this bactericidal disinfectant) is a bactericidal disinfectant containing 500 ppm to 1,500 ppm of ferric ions, 500 ppm to 2,000 ppm of L-ascorbic acid and 200 ppm to 2,000 ppm of one or two of sorbic acid, benzoic acid and paraoxybenzoic acid ester as principal components. It has already been granted a U.S. patent (U.S. Pat. No. 6,296,881B1), and its components are recognized in Japan as food additives. At present, the disinfectants widely used by medical institutions include alcohols, phenols, halogen compounds, quaternary ammonium salts, biguanide compounds, aldehydes and the like, but none meets all the conditions of excellent bactericidal action, safety and low toxicity, excellent maintainability and cheapness. For example, the biguanide compound having the trade name “Hibitane” is an excellent disinfectant whose low toxicity and high effectiveness have made it a best seller worldwide for decades, but it has little effect on fungi and no effect on tubercular bacilli and spores. Some common bacteria have also developed resistance, and are a cause of hospital infections. On the other hand, “this bactericidal disinfectant,” which was developed to fill in the gaps of conventional treatment, kills most bacteria and fungi in only 10 seconds, and is capable of destroying even spores in 1 to 120 minutes. Despite its excellent bactericidal properties, however, its toxicity is lower than that of any other existing disinfectant as shown below.
(1) Effects on skin: No abnormalities appeared from application to the rear feet (foot pads) of mice twice a day for 6 months.
(2) Effects of oral administration: 1 ml/mouse was administered but no toxicity was seen. This dose corresponds to 1.8 L for a human. The estimated LD50 is 10 ml/mouse, which corresponds to 18 L for a human.
(3) Effects of intraperitoneal administration: The LD50 is about 1 ml/mouse
(4) Effects on cultured (animal) cells: A 103× dilution of the concentration for use did not inhibit cell proliferation. This is about 1/10 the toxicity of Hibitane.
(5) Effects on humans:
a) Hand and finger disinfection: No abnormalities were observed even after 7 years of daily use, apart from a slight reddening of the skin.
b) Gargling: No abnormalities of the mucous membranes were observed after 7 years of gargling every morning and night, and no side-effects or toxicity appeared. In addition, no cavities occurred during that period and it was not necessary to consult a dentist.
The following are the results of various tests of “this bactericidal disinfectant” in connection with periodontal disease.
“This bactericidal disinfectant” was prepared by preparing an aqueous solution of 3,000 ppm of ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3.6H2O) as Fe3+, an aqueous solution of L-ascorbic acid with a concentration of 3,000 ppm and an aqueous solution of potassium sorbate with a concentration of 1,500 ppm, and mixing equal amounts of these aqueous solutions.
A suspension (1×109 cells/ml saline solution) of the test bacterium was prepared, and 2% by weight of “this bactericidal disinfectant” was dripped into this cell liquid. Cells were harvested over time with one platinum loop, seeded on bacterial growth medium and cultured in an optimal environment, and the bactericidal effects were observed according to the presence or absence of bacterial proliferation. The bactericidal disinfectant used in the test was set to the commonly used concentration. The results after 10 to 60 seconds of contact and the results after 1 to 120 minutes of contact are shown in Table 2. As is clear from Table 2, “this bactericidal disinfectant” killed most bacterial species in their active forms within about 10 seconds. The strong periodontal pathogens P. gingivalis, P. intermedia and A. actimomycetemconitans were no exception. However, it took from 1 to 120 minutes to kill spores of sporulating bacteria depending on the stage of formation. According to statistics, the time taken for hand washing and gargling by medical workers and others is from 10 to 15 seconds, and in this context “this bactericidal disinfectant” is highly effective. When the same test was performed using the biguanide compound Hibitane, 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and Acrinol, which are disinfectants widely used in hospitals and dentists' offices, 30 to 60 seconds was required, and as mentioned before Hibitane was ineffective against Mycobacterium and spores, while the 3% hydrogen peroxide solution was also ineffective against spores and took 1 minute or more to kill Mycobacterium. The results for acrinol were similar to those for the 3% hydrogen peroxide solution.
In general, it is known that the effects of disinfectants are reduced by contamination with organic matter, particularly proteins, so the bactericidal effects in the presence of organic matter were investigated. First, skim milk and yeast extract were each added to “this bactericidal disinfectant” in amounts of 1 ppm, 50 ppm and 100 ppm, while at the same time 2% by weight of a 1×109 cells/ml physiological saline solution of MRSA or E. coli O-157 as the test bacterium was dripped into these aqueous solutions. The contact time between the test bacterium and “this bactericidal disinfectant” was 10 seconds to 5 minutes, and 10 μl samples of the mixed test bacterium liquid were collected over time, seeded in appropriate medium and cultured at 37° C. to evaluate the bactericidal effects according to the presence or absence of bacterial growth. The results are as shown in Table 3. The presence of organic matter had no effect when the concentration of organic matter was 1 ppm, but when the concentration of organic matter was 50 ppm or more it had a slight effect. The same test was also performed with bacterial species other than the two mentioned above, with similar results. The same test was also performed using disinfectants commonly used in dentists' offices, but at concentrations over 50 ppm the bacteria did not die after 1 minute of contact with Hibitane, and survived 5 minutes of contact in some cases depending on the type and amount of organic matter. The results obtained with the 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and acrinol were similar to those for Hibitane.
We investigated whether in the putrefaction process after food preparation, spraying “this bactericidal disinfectant” on food would stop the progress of putrefaction, and what would be the degree of that bactericidal effect. Normally disinfectants are not applied to food after preparation, but often scraps of food work their way into periodontal pockets, providing a source of nutrition for bacteria, and since the ingredients in “this bactericidal disinfectant” are compounds which are recognized as food additives, it is important to assess these effects. “Cooked rice”, “tofu”, “spinach with sesame”, and “fried meat and vegetables” immediately after preparation were crushed as the samples, homogenized, and left at 28° C. After 5 hours, part of each sample was taken for counting live bacteria, while the rest of each sample was sprayed thoroughly with the disinfectant. Live cells were counted 1 hour, 2 hours and 24 hours after spraying. Water alone was sprayed as a control. After each of the samples had been left for 24 hours, part was taken for counting live cells while the remainder of each sample was sprayed thoroughly with each disinfectant. As when the samples were left for 5 hours, live cells were counted 1 hour, 2 hours and 24 hours after spraying. Water alone was sprayed as a control. Live cells were counted by the poured plate method using 5 g of each sample, which was taken and diluted by ordinary methods.
The degree of putrefaction naturally differs according to the method of preparation, food material and environment. In the case of these samples, the live cell count in the cooked rice was 2×10 cells/g of sample immediately after preparation, 1×103 cell/g of sample after 5 hours, 5×105 cell/g of sample after 24 hours, and 7×106 cell/g of sample after 48 hours. In the case of the tofu the initial live cell count was 2×104 cells/g of sample, but this rose to 8×105 cells/g of sample after 5 hours, 9×107 cells/g of sample after 24 hours and 1×109 cells/g of sample after 48 hours, with a higher level of putrefaction. In the case of the spinach with sesame, the count was 2×103 cells/g of sample immediately after preparation, rising to 5×104 cells/g of sample after 5 hours, 3×107 cells/g of sample after 24 hours and 2×108 cell/g of sample after 48 hours. In the case of the fried meat and vegetables, the count was 5×10 cells/g of sample immediately after preparation, rising to 2×103 cells/g of sample after 5 hours, 2×108 cells/g of sample after 24 hours, at which point there was a slight smell of putrefaction, and 3×109 cell/g of sample after 48 hours, by which point putrefaction had progressed to a higher level.
The test results are shown in Table 4. Five hours after preparation when bacteria had not proliferated very much, spraying of disinfectant immediately reduced cell counts to 1/100 to 1/200, with some differences depending on the type of prepared food. After 1 hour this had dropped to 1/1000 to 1/5000 of the original count, and after 2 hours the cells had died out, with counts of 10 cells/g of sample or less. The surviving bacteria did not proliferate even after 24 hours. In meat and other protein-rich foods, 7×102 cells/g of sample (about 1%) survived 2 hours after spraying of disinfectant. 24 hours after preparation the cell counts were on the order of 107 to 108, but these fell to 1/1000 to 1/10,000 immediately after spraying of disinfectant, to 1/10,000 to 1/500,000 after 1 hour and to 1/300,000 to 1/2,000,000 after 2 hours. The cell count at this point was about 102 cells/g of sample. After 24 hours the cell count was slightly higher than after 2 hours, but this was thought to reflect not so much proliferation of surviving bacteria as bacteria precipitating from the air. Consequently, bactericide was generally achieved although complete eradication was not. That is, there is a bactericidal effect and a suppression effect on the growth of putrefying bacteria in food.
The same test was performed using disinfectants widely used in dentists' offices in addition to “this bactericidal disinfectant,” with the results shown in Table 4. When Hibitane was sprayed, the rate of decrease in cell counts immediately after spraying was less than that achieved with “this bactericidal disinfectant,” although the tendency was the same. However, this effect weakened over time and the bacteria began to proliferate again. That is, although growth of putrefying bacteria in food was suppressed to a certain extent, there was not a true bactericidal effect. Moreover, most of the bacteria survived immediately after spraying of a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution, and after 24 hours the food was on the point of putrefaction.
The data for “this bactericidal disinfectant” in Test Examples 1 through 3 suggest the potential for a strong bactericidal effect against periodontal pathogens hidden in periodontal pockets. By contrast, the disinfectants widely used in dentistry are somewhat effective when the periodontal pathogens do not have a barrier, but when plaque or calculus forms and when there is a nutritional source such as organic matter or food residue, their effects are much less.
Based on the above test results, we tested the effectiveness of each bactericidal disinfectant using as the test material plaque, which is regarded as the root cause of periodontal disease.
Plaque adhering to supragingival calculus was collected, sections cut to a thickness of 200 μm and powdered plaque ground to a grain size of 10 μm were soaked in 1 ml of “this bactericidal disinfectant,” and the numbers of live cells contained therein were measured over time by ordinary methods. The results are as shown in Table 5. The live cell count of 4×109 cells contained in 20 mg of plaque sections was reduced by ¾ after 1 minute of immersion, falling to 1/5,000 of the original cell count after 5 minutes, and after 10 minutes all of the bacteria had died. All of the bacteria in the powdered plaque were eliminated within 3 minutes. That is, it was shown that “this bactericidal disinfectant” breaks through the barrier, penetrating the inside of the plaque and having a bactericidal effect on bacteria therein. In the case of Hibitane (Hibitane gel), 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and acrinol, which are widely used in the dental field, the bacteria on the plaque surface were mainly eliminated within 3 minutes, but the bacteria inside the plaque endured even 60 minutes of immersion, with half of the cells surviving. This means that they could not definitively damage the plaque, which is an aggregation of bacteria. When the same test was performed using plaque adhering to subgingival calculus (dense and hard), all the bacteria were eliminated in about 15 minutes in the case of the plate-shaped plaque and within 3 minutes in the case of the powder. By contrast, when Hibitane and the like were used the bacteria inside the plaque endured 60 minutes of immersion and continued to survive as described above.
Next, considering cases in which further organic matter adheres to or contaminates plaque adhering to calculus, we mixed 20 mg of plaque with 20 mg of yeast extract and performed a test by the methods described above. The results are as shown in Table 6. There was little effect from the organic matter, with the cell count falling to about 1/2,000 the original count after 5 minutes of immersion and all bacteria being eliminated after 10 minutes of immersion in the case of the plate-shaped plaque. In the case of the powdered plaque, all the bacteria were eliminated after 3 minutes of immersion. By contrast, with commonly-used disinfectants disinfection of the plaque surface took 10 minutes due to the presence of organic matter, and most of the internal bacteria survived. That is, it is shown that unless plaque is completely eliminated in treatment, although a temporary improvement may be seen the problem will reoccur repeatedly.
As is clear from the various test results given in Test Examples 1 through 4 above, “this bactericidal disinfectant” inflicts severe damage on bacteria surviving in active form in various environments. The periodontal disease pathogens living in periodontal pockets and hiding in hard to remove plaque are no exception, and it was shown that injection of “this bactericidal disinfectant” in these cases destroys the bacteria within seconds to about 10 minutes, with some differences depending on the growth stage and type of plaque. Moreover, it should be mentioned that in animal tests and human experiments such as those described above, “this bactericidal disinfectant” was shown to have very little damaging effect on cells and tissue, and to promote tissue regeneration.
About 1 cm2 of mouse skin was peeled off and various bactericidal disinfectants at ordinary concentrations were applied to the wounds using absorbent cotton every morning and night. Water was applied as a control. The results are as shown in Table 7. In the case of the control mouse it took 5 days for a thin skin to be regenerated over the wound, 12 days for the skin to regain its original thickness, and 35 days for the coat to grow back, while with application of “this bactericidal disinfectant” it took 4 days for the wound to close, 10 days for the skin to regain its original thickness and only 30 days for the coat to grow back. These results match those obtained with iodine tincture, meaning that both “this bactericidal disinfectant” and iodine tincture promote tissue regeneration. By contrast, with application of Hibitane gel, 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and acrinol, which are widely used in dentistry, it took 5 days for a thin skin to form, 12 to 15 days for the skin to regain its original thickness and 40 days for the coat to grow back. That is, these disinfectants act as poisons that suppress tissue regeneration.
When dilutions of “this bactericidal disinfectant” were added to medium, as shown in Table 8, they stimulated growth of the lactic acid bacillus used in the present invention. It is well known that growth of lactobacilli is promoted by addition of acetic acid, but it is surprising that a bactericidal disinfectant with bactericidal action should have a growth-promoting effect even in dilution. However, as shown in Table 9, periodontal disease pathogens and other pathogenic bacteria are not affected in this way. This means that if “this bactericidal disinfectant” is first injected into a periodontal pocket which is then washed with water and filled with the novel Lactobacillus casei species (hereunder, “novel lactobacillus”) of the present invention which has unique abilities as described below, growth of the “novel lactobacillus” will be stimulated, enhancing the therapeutic effects against periodontal disease. By contrast, when widely-used disinfectants were added to medium at different concentrations, bacterial growth was sometimes suppressed but never stimulated. Moreover, the principal component Fe3+ of “this bactericidal disinfectant” is adsorbed by tooth surfaces and serves as a barrier to protect them against re-adhesion by periodontal pathogens. Because it has an astringent effect, moreover, secretion of periodontal groove fluid that provides a nutrient source for periodontal pathogens is temporarily reduced, thus suppressing growth and proliferation by cutting off part of the nutrient supply for periodontal pathogens hidden inside the grooves.
The present invention is explained in detail below based on examples, but the essence of the present invention is not limited to these. The manufacturing processes can be changed, and any cell numbers can of course be obtained by using a known extender or excipient. The preparation can be formulated in any way together with appropriate excipients, as a powder, granules, capsules or the like for example.
The Lactobacillus casei (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) of the present invention was seeded in 10 L of medium of pH 7.2 containing 10 g of peptone, 5 g of meat extract, 5 g of yeast extract, 10 g of lactose, 2 g of K2HPO4, 0.1 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 1 g of NaCl, 2 g of diammonium citrate, 5 g of sodium acetate, 3 g of CaCO3, 0.3 g of MnSO4.5H2O, 0.03 g of FeSO4.7H2O and 1 g of L-cysteine per liter, and cultured anaerobically for 72 hours at 37° C. After completion of culture, the culture liquid was paper filtered to remove the CaCO3, and 3 L of the filtrate was refrigerated while the remaining liquid was centrifuged to obtain a supernatant and an 8.4 g bacterial mass. This was then washed in 420 ml of physiological saline solution, and centrifuged twice. The resulting purified bacterial mass was placed in a solution consisting of 70 g skim milk, 20 g soluble starch, 0.5 g sodium glutamate and 1000 ml purified water, agitated, and vacuum freeze dried by ordinary means to obtain 101 g of bacterial preparation. When measured, the cell count of this bacterial preparation was 2.5×1010 cells/g. The resulting preparation consisted of 101 g of freeze-dried bacterial cells (including preservative), 3000 ml of culture liquid and 6700 ml of culture filtrate (disinfected liquid).
The Lactobacillus casei (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) of the present invention was seeded in 10 L of medium of pH 6.8 containing 3 g of casamino acids, 2 g of yeast extract, 50 ml of tomato juice, 2 g of glucose, 1 g of NaCl, 1 g of KH2PO4, 0.7 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 1 g of CaCl2.2H2O, 0.5 ml of Tween 80 and 0.5 g of soluble starch per liter, and cultured in a facultative anaerobic culture for 96 hours at 30° C. After completion of culture, 3 L of the culture liquid was refrigerated while the remaining 7 L was centrifuged to obtain a supernatant and a 5.6 g bacterial mass. This was then washed in 280 ml of physiological saline solution, and centrifuged again. 2.6 g of the resulting purified bacterial mass was mixed well with 10.4 g of potato starch, and refrigerated. The remaining 3 g of purified bacterial mass was placed in a solution consisting of 15 g of skim milk, 15 g of soluble starch, 5 g of trehalose, 0.2 g of cysteine and 500 ml of purified water, agitated, and vacuum freeze dried by ordinary means to obtain 39 g of bacterial preparation. When measured, the cell count of this bacterial preparation was 2×1010 cells/g. The resulting preparation consisted of 39 g of freeze-dried bacterial cells (including preservative), 13 g of wet bacterial cells (including preservative), 3000 ml of culture liquid and 6700 ml of culture filtrate (disinfected liquid).
The Lactobacillus casei (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) of the present invention was seeded in 5 L of medium containing 100 g of skim milk and 1 g of trehalose per liter which had been adjusted to pH 6.8, and cultured in a facultative anaerobic culture for 72 hours at 37° C. Next, 75 g of trehalose was added to this culture liquid (yoghurt), which was well agitated and vacuum freeze dried by ordinary methods to obtain 590 g of bacterial preparation. When counted, the cell count of this bacterial preparation was 5×109 cells/g. The resulting bacterial preparation contained bacterial cells and skim milk fermentation products.
To prepare the novel lactobacillus (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) preparation of the present invention, the antibiotic-resistant novel lactobacillus (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) of the present invention was seeded in 10 L of medium of pH 7.2 containing 5 g of peptone, 3 g of meat extract, 2 g of yeast extract, 1 g of CGF, 5 g of starch, 1 g of lactose, 2 g of diammonium citrate, 3 g of sodium acetate, 0.2 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 0.03 g of FeSO4.7H2O and 1 g of L-cysteine per liter, and cultured anaerobically for 3 days at 37° C. After completion of culture, the culture liquid was paper filtered to remove the CaCO3 and then centrifuged, and 7.8 g of the resulting bacterial cells were dispersed in 370 ml of physiological saline solution and centrifuged again twice. The resulting purified cell mass was dispersed in 450 ml of previously sterilized 5% starch solution, and vacuum freeze dried by ordinary methods to obtain 30 g of novel lactobacillus preparation. The live cell content of this bacterial preparation was 1×1011 cells/g.
The purified cell bodies manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4 were mixed with 15.7 ml of olive oil to manufacture an oil preparation. The live cell content of this bacterial preparation was 2×1011 cells/g. 10 g of this oil preparation was mixed into 10 g of hydrophilic ointment to manufacture a lactobacillus cream. Next, 400 mg of amoxicillin (AMPC), 100 mg of erythromycin (EM), 100 mg of fradiomycin (FRM) and 100 mg of cefaclor (CCL) as antibiotics were mixed with the lactobacillus cream to manufacture an antibiotic-containing lactobacillus cream.
The speed and percentage of S-R mutations in E. coli O-157 due to the effects of toxin-weakening antibiotics produced by Lactobacillus casei when E. coli O-157 and Lactobacillus casei were both present were investigated by means of a mixed culture of E. coli O-157 and the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971) and a mixed culture of E. coli O-157 and the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443). The medium was composed of 5 g of meat extract, 1 g of yeast extract, 5 g of peptone, 2 g of NaCl, 1 g of CaCO3 and 2 g of glucose or starch per liter, with the pH adjusted to 7.2. Culture was anaerobic at 37° C., with subcultures every 72 hours which were diluted and applied each time to plate medium. The resulting colonies were observed, and the numbers of S types (original) and R types (toxin-weakened) were counted and the percentages compared. The results are shown in Table 10 and Table 11. As shown in Table 10, when glucose was used as the sugar cell counts fluctuated greatly with subculturing when E. coli O-157 was subcultured together with the original Lactobacillus casei (FERM BP-6971). From about the 5th subculture the R type appeared (30%) and the percentage of R type increased as subculturing continued, so that all the bacteria were of the R type by the 18th subculture. The S type did not reappear with subsequent subculturing. By contrast, when E. coli was subcultured together with the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443), the R type appeared by the third subculture at a rate of 5%, reaching 50% by the 5th subculture, and by the 12th subculture all of the E. coli O-157 were of the R type. That is, E. coli O-157 was affected more by the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention than by the original Lactobacillus casei species. This is attributed to the difference in proliferation potency between the two Lactobacillus casei species.
As shown in Table 11, when starch was used as the sugar the proliferative potency of E. coli O-157 declined, but proliferation of the original Lactobacillus casei species declined still more, and the final cell count was less than 5×108 cells. Because of this reduction in effectiveness the E. coli O-157 mutated more slowly to the R type, with a percentage of 10% in the 7th generation and 50% in the 20th generation. The percentage of R type never exceeded 70% with continued subculturing. However, the proliferative potency of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention was no different than with glucose, and in this case the proliferative potency of the E. coli O-157 declined with each subculture, with the percentage of R type reaching 15% in the 3rd generation and 100% in the 7th generation.
In addition to E. coli O-157, similar tests were performed using Salmonella enteritidis and Shigella flexneri, but as in the case of E. coli O-157 mutation into the R type was much faster with the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention than with the original Lactobacillus casei species as shown in Table 12. When a strain of the pathogen that had mutated to the R type was administered orally and intraperitoneally to mice at the lethal dosage for the S type, the fatality rate was 0 and coats and behavior were no different than those of untreated mice, confirming that pathogenicity had mainly been eliminated.
A test has already been done in which daily ingestion of 2 g of the freeze-dried bacterial cells (5×108 cells/g) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 and consisting of the original Lactobacillus casei caused an increase in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, which are known as beneficial components of the intestinal flora, and conversely a decrease in Clostridium and Veillonella, which are known as harmful bacteria. In this example the results of ingestion of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention by 10 healthy subjects were measured and compared over time for 3 months. The results are shown in Table 13. When the original Lactobacillus casei (FERM BP-6971) was ingested Bifidobacterium increased about 90% in 3 months and Lactobacillus casei increased 150%, while Clostridium decreased 50% and Veillonella decreased 25%. However, when the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) was ingested Bifidobacterium increased 133% in 3 months and Lactobacillus casei increased 300%, while Clostridium decreased 96% and Veillonella decreased 98.4%. That is, the effects on beneficial and harmful bacteria making up the intestinal flora are much greater with the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention. The ability to reduce harmful bacteria is particular striking.
Next, 2 g of the freeze-dried bacterial cells manufactured in the aforementioned Lactobacillus casei Manufacturing Example 1 were administered to 10 invalids, and bacteria were measured and compared over time for 3 months. The results are shown in Table 14. As shown in Tables 13 and 14, before administration the healthy subject had about 2 times the number of beneficial bacterial in their intestinal flora as did the invalids, and only about ⅓ the numbers of harmful bacteria. This shows that the state of the intestinal flora reflects the current state of health. In response to a survey, all of the healthy subjects who had participated in the test felt themselves to be healthier, while the invalids reported more confidence in their health. Specific responses included reports that (1) fatigue decreased, (2) color improved, (3) stool abnormalities cleared up, (4) skin regained tautness and beauty, (5) obesity improved, (6) high blood pressure returned to normal and (7) atopy was considerably improved, and the proportion of such responses was much greater among those who ingested the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention.
Three W 600 mm×D 200 mm×H 150 mm planters were prepared, and each was filled with normal field soil mixed with 100 g of ripe compost and 12 g of chemical fertilizer (Nippon Godo Fertilizer Co. Green Map, N: 8%, P: 5%, K: 5%) and scattered with 10 g of magnesium lime (NAC Co., soil improver consisting of 5 to 7% magnesium oxide mixed with slaked lime). Next, furrows were made to a depth of 5 to 8 mm, and planted by hand with radish seeds. Germination occurred on the fifth day, and on the following day 2 g of centrifuged bacterial mass consisting of original Lactobacillus casei (FERM BP-6971) that had been cultured in the medium described in Manufacturing Example 2 was added to 200 ml, agitated well and applied to the control group. Meanwhile, 2 g of centrifuged bacterial mass consisting of the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) that had been cultured in the medium described in Manufacturing Example 2 was added to 200 ml of water, agitated well and applied to the test group. Water alone was applied to the untreated group. On about the 10th day after emergence of leaves these were culled at about 5 cm intervals, leaving 30 radish plants in each planter. Suspensions of the respective centrifuged cell masses were applied to the control group and test group together with 150 ml of a 500 times dilution of fertilizer, while only 150 ml of a 500 times dilution of fertilizer was applied to the untreated group. The radishes were then watered as necessary to prevent them from drying out and harvested on the 28th day. The results are as shown in Table 15. The radishes harvested from the test group that was treated with the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention were superior not only to the untreated radishes but also to the plants in the control group which were treated with the original Lactobacillus casei in terms of all measures of quality including weight, luster, smell, flesh, taste and crispness.
A growing test was performed with test groups as in Example 4 by hydroponic cultivation of white radish sprout seeds. Sponge was spread on the bottom of a W 100×D 100×H 180 mm polyethylene box, soaked with water, and sown overall with white radish sprout seeds. With the temperature set to 22° C. these were covered with black cloth for 5 days to block the light, after which the cloth was removed and they were grown in natural light. For the control group, 1 g of freeze-dried bacterial cells of the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971) were added to 100 ml of water, well agitated, and applied by misting on the 3rd and 5th days. For the test group, 1 g of freeze-dried bacterial cells of the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 were added to 100 ml of water, well agitated, and applied by misting on the 3rd and 5th days. Only water was applied to the untreated group. As shown by the growing results in Table 16, application of the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention resulted in better white radish sprouts than in the untreated group or control group.
As is clear from Examples 1 through 5, the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention, which has acquired various properties through acclimatization while retaining the properties of the original Lactobacillus casei species, has been confirmed to improve vitality to an incalculable extent in the living body, and is fundamentally a different strain from the original Lactobacillus casei species.
Regarding the toxicity of P. gingivalis and P. intermedia, it has been shown that the quality and quantity of the toxins produced can be estimated from the results of animal tests by observing the color and smell of black colonies grown on blood plates and the strength of adhesiveness on the plate, while in the case of A. actinomycetemcomitans, the quality and quantity of toxins produced can be estimated from observing adhesiveness and hemolytic strength. We therefore cultured the aforementioned principal periodontal pathogens together with the “novel lactobacillus” to investigate what tendencies and reactions would be exhibited by the periodontal pathogens. Using Nissui modified GAM bouillon as the medium, the bacteria were cultured anaerobically at 37° C. with subcultures every 72 hours, at which time the culture was diluted and applied by ordinary methods to blood plate medium, and the cell counts and conditions of the resulting colonies were observed over time. The results are shown in Tables 17, 18 and 19. As is clear from Table 17, the cell count of P. gingivalis fell gradually with each subculture, disappearing by the 25th subculture. During this time toxicity gradually weakened beginning with the 5th subculture, and while some slight toxicity was still present by the 15th subculture, by the 20th it had virtually disappeared. It was confirmed that mice infected periodontally with this bacteria did not develop periodontitis. As is clear from Table 18, the cell count of P. intermedia declined gradually with subculturing, and the bacteria had disappeared by the 15th subculture. Pathogenicity also declined as a result, disappearing by the 12th subculture. As is clear from Table 19, the cell count of A. actinomycetemcomitans declined with each subculture, but not as rapidly as did P. gingivalis and P. intermedia. Past a certain point, however, A. actinomycetemcomitans declined rapidly, disappearing by the 18th subculture. In mouse tests, pathogenicity had completely disappeared by the 12th culture. Similar co-culture tests were performed using other bacteria implicated in periodontal disease, such as F. nucleatum, B. forsythus, L. buccalis, E. corrodens and also Streptococcus, which are common in the oral cavity, but all of these were overcome by the proliferative potency and bioactive substances of the lactobacillus of the present invention, and cell counts and toxicity were shown to decline with each subculture.
When the “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) is streak cultured anaerobically for 72 hours at 37° C. in the center of a plate with a 90 mm diameter, and various periodontal pathogens are streak cultured to the edge thereof, the development of the periodontal pathogens is arrested near the areas occupied by the FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) by the effect of the antibiotic-like bioactive substances produced by FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443). We therefore observed how the growth range would change when periodontal pathogens growing at the edge where development was arrested were repeatedly fished out and streak cultured on growth plates of FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443). In this example, the FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) was not mixed with the periodontal pathogens as in Example 5. Modified GAM medium was used on the plates. The results are as shown in Table 20. The range of arrest due to FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) was about the same after several subcultures as in the initial culture, but past a certain point the range of arrest grew rapidly, and by the 13th to 15th subculture the pathogens had been eliminated from the Petri dish. Toxicity gradually declined at the same time and finally disappeared.
In a sensitivity test using existing antibiotics, the range of arrest gradually shrank in all cases with each passage, and resistance was finally achieved. That is, antibiotic-resistant strains appeared, and the bacterial toxins were either unchanged or often grew stronger. The appearance and spread of MRSA, VRE, and multidrug resistant M. tuberculosis, Ps. aeruginosa and the like is well known to be a serious problem worldwide. Examples 6 and 7 above are evidence that periodontal pathogens do not develop resistance due to the strong effects of FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) whether they contact it directly or not, but rather their ability to grow and proliferate is suppressed over time and toxicity is completely eliminated.
To measure the adhesiveness of the “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) in periodontal pockets, a solution of cells (2×1010/ml) suspended in physiological saline was injected into pockets of equivalent depth, sterile physiological saline was injected into the pockets on the next day, and after 5 minutes the injected saline was aspirated out of the pockets and the growth and decline of FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) was observed every day for a week. A mucilage of L. acidophilus, which colonizes mucous membranes, was prepared as a control, and this and the highly adhesive B. natto were injected separately in the same number and the progress observed. The results are shown in Table 21. When 2×1010/ml of FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) was injected, most (90% to 95%) were washed away, but the remaining bacteria persisted for about a week, and the colonization rate was higher the deeper the pocket. This means that FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) is capable of growing using periodontal groove fluid as its main nutrient source, and can be more active in more advanced periodontal disease. By contrast, no L. acidophilus was seen from the 4th day and no B. natto from the 3rd day. That is, these bacteria could not establish themselves and proliferate in periodontal pockets.
Growth and decline in cell numbers were observed when the “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) was injected into periodontal pockets on successive days and when it was injected every other day. As shown in Table 22, when the bacteria was injected every day the cell counts in the pockets rose gradually, with colonization and proliferation being better the deeper the pocket, while when it was injected every other day colonization and proliferation of the bacteria was somewhat slower than with daily injection, but cell numbers rose gradually overall. This suggests that it is sufficient to inject the bacteria on alternate days.
The “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) is not only effective against all kinds of acute and chronic infections, but is also effective in improving systemic chronic conditions such as diabetes which are factors associated with periodontal disease. That is, administration of the novel lactobacillus of the present invention increases the body's natural healing power, which translates into vitality. Vitality is the body's ability to promote growth and regenerate tissue.
45 goldfish (Wakin) with an average length of 4.2 cm exhibiting initial symptoms of Saproglenia disease were divided into three groups, an untreated group, a control group and a test group, and observed for 2 months in a total of 9 water tanks with the water temperatures for each group set to 15° C., 20° C. and 25° C. Five goldfish were reared in 5 liters of water in each tank. 1 g of freeze-dried bacterial cells (5×106 cells/ml of tank water) of the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971) was administered to the control group. 1 g of freeze-dried bacterial cells (5×106 cells/ml of tank water) of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 was administered to the test group. The goldfish in the untreated group were reared without any treatment. The results are shown in Table 23. As shown in Table 23, in the untreated group all the goldfish died in less than a month regardless of water temperature, with a mean survival time of 18 days. In the control group receiving the original Lactobacillus casei species, all the goldfish died in less than a month in the 25° C. tank, with a mean survival time of 23 days, but in the tanks set to 15° C. and 25° C. the Saproglenia grew more slowly and the goldfish survived longer, with 2 dying after one month and another 2 dying after 2 months at 15° C., for a mortality rate of 80%. At 20° C., 2 died after one month and all after 2 months, for a mortality rate of 100%. By contrast, using the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention 1 goldfish died on the 45 day of rearing in the 20° C. tank, while in the 25° C. tank 1 goldfish died on the 25th day and 1 goldfish died on the 50th day, but the other goldfish were all healthy and the Saproglenia adhering to their body surfaces declined until it was almost imperceptible. The growth rate was the same as that of healthy goldfish. This indicates that the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention, which has been acclimated to low temperatures, is effective even at a low temperature of 15° C.
A feeding trial was performed in tanks set to the same conditions as in Example 10 using groups of 5 goldfish (Wakin) suffering from goldfish ulcer disease, in which Aeromonas invades through a wound and dissolves the surrounding flesh, causing the internal organs to be exposed in severe cases. The symptoms of goldfish ulcer disease ranged from mild to moderate, and the goldfish were reared for 2 months with the symptoms balanced among the tanks. The results are shown in Table 24. As shown in Table 24, the symptoms of the goldfish in the untreated group progressed regardless of water temperature, and within 2 months the organs were exposed and all fish died. In the control group receiving the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971), the fish with mild symptoms maintained their status at the lower water temperature, but when the water temperature was high the symptoms progressed slowly and ultimately 60% to 80% of the fish died within 2 months. By contrast, in the test group receiving the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) those fish with mild symptoms were mostly cured regardless of water temperature. Even in the case of moderate symptoms the wounds gradually healed, and no fish died even after 2 months.
About 1 cm2 of mouse skin was peeled off, after which water was applied twice morning and night to the untreated group, while centrifuged cells of the standard ATCC 393 strain of L. casei and the “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) were applied to the bacterial treatment groups, and progress was observed. As shown in
To investigate cell increase with animal cells and plant cells, the standard ATCC 393 strain of L. casei and the “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) were seeded in medium of pH 7.2 containing 3 g of peptone, 2 g of tryptone, 3 g of meat extract, 1 g of CGF, 1 g of yeast extract, 3 g of starch, 1 g of trehalose, 1.5 g of KH2PO4, 0.7 g of MgSO4.7H2O, 1 g of NaCl, 1 g of diammonium citrate, 1 g of (NH4)2HPO4, 2 g of sodium acetate, 2 g of CaCO3, 0.2 g of MnSO4.xH2O, 0.03 g of FeSO4.7H2O, 0.01 g of ZnSO4, 0.2 g of L-cysteine and 1 g of taurine per liter, and cultured anaerobically for 72 hours at 37° C., monkey kidney (V-1) cells, mouse P815 mastocytoma cells and mouse CEA lymphocytes were mixed 2×105 cells/ml with culture liquid consisting of Japan Pharmaceutical Co. GIT medium for animal culture to which 5% centrifuged supernatant from the lactobacillus cultures had been added or not added, and live cells were counted after 48 hours. The results are shown in
Periodontal pathogens have a variety of pathogenic factors which inflict direct or indirect damage on periodontal tissue, including adhesion-related factors, proteinases and toxins, substance that act as toxins, metabolic products and the like. Specific examples include endotoxins (LPSI), collagenases, trypsin-like enzymes, fibroblast-suppressing enzymes and other destructive enzymes, leukocytotoxins, streptolysin, hydrogen sulfide, fatty acids and other cell toxins as well as physical adhesion by means of long cilia to mucosal epithelium, red blood cells and other bacteria. Endotoxins in particular have numerous effects including activating osteoclasts (promoting absorption of alveolar bone), damaging fibroblasts and promoting immunopathological reactions (damaging the circulation of periodontal tissue). The “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) not only blocks the proliferation of periodontal pathogens and acts to weaken their pathogenicity, but also converts and detoxifies some of the toxins produced by periodontal pathogens.
Cells of periodontal pathogens were cultured for 120 hours anaerobically at 37° C. in modified GAM bouillon, collected by centrifugation, floated in physiological saline and washed three times by centrifugation. They were then floated uniformly in five times the amount of water and cooled to 0° C., and the same amount of an ice-cooled aqueous solution of 0.5 N trichloroacetic acid was added and left for 3 hours at 0° C. The cell body residue was then removed by centrifugation, 2 volume equivalents of chilled ethanol were added to the supernatant, and the precipitate was centrifuged. The precipitate was washed with a small amount of ethanol and then with ether, resulting in an endotoxin in the form of a white powder. A disk was impregnated with 5 mg of this endotoxin and dried to prepare a sensitivity disk. Next the L. casei standard ATCC 393 strain and the “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) were applied to BCP plate medium containing 2.5 g yeast extract, 5 g peptone, 1 g glucose, 0.1 g L-cysteine, 1 g Polysorbate 80 and 0.06 g BCP per liter, the sensitivity disk prepared above was placed in the center of the medium, and the bacteria were cultured anaerobically for 48 hours at 37° C. As a result, growth of ATCC393 was blocked 12 mm from the edge of the disk, while the FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) grew prolifically at the edge of the disk. This indicates that FERM BP-10059 (FERM P-19443) was incorporating these endotoxins into its cells as vitamin-like growth factors. Moreover, the “novel lactobacillus” (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) has the ability to aggressively depress odiferous sulfur compounds such as fatty acids and hydrogen sulfide, and its proliferation is stimulated by the addition of these substances.
Three groups of 15 patients suffering respectively from acute colitis, acute cystitis and conjunctivitis, diseases caused by similar bacteria and having similar symptoms, were each subdivided into 3 subgroups of 5 patients each. In each group, the A subgroup was treated for 5 days with 1000 mg/day of antibiotics alone, the B subgroup was treated for 5 days with 500 mg/day of antibiotics and for 10 days with 2 g/day (5×1010 cells/day) of freeze-dried cells of the antibiotic-resistant Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured by the methods of Manufacturing Example 1, and the C subgroup was first treated with 1000 mg/day of antibiotics alone, and once the acute symptoms had subsided the antibiotic was stopped (normally for 2 to 3 days) and the group was then treated like the B subgroup for 7 days with 2 g/day of freeze-dried bacterial cells. The average treatment effects for each group over 10 days are shown in Table 25. As is clear from Table 25, use of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention in conjunction with conventional antibiotic administration for the treatment of acute infection or administration of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention after administration of antibiotics offers great advantages, especially in light of the problems of drug resistance encountered with conventional therapy using only antibiotics, including (a) allowing the antibiotic dose to be reduced by half, (b) allowing the burden on patients to be greatly reduced by shortening the time required to reduce, ameliorate and eliminate symptoms with virtually no side-effects, and (c) avoiding such problems as disturbance of the intestinal flora and microbial substitution. For acute infections, the results are similar (with some differences in pathogens and symptoms) to the therapeutic results achieved with the original Lactobacillus casei species in Comparative Example 1 below.
As in Example 15, three groups of 15 patients suffering respectively from acute colitis, acute cystitis and conjunctivitis, diseases caused by similar bacteria and having similar symptoms, were each subdivided into 3 subgroups of 5 patients each. In each group, the A subgroup was treated for 5 days with 1000 mg/day of antibiotics alone, the B subgroup was treated for 5 days with 500 mg/day of antibiotics and for 10 days with 2 g/day (5×109 cells/day) of freeze-dried cells of FERM BP-6972, one of the antibiotic-resistant original Lactobacillus casei species, which was manufactured by the methods of Manufacturing Example 1, and the C subgroup was first treated with 1000 mg/day of antibiotics alone, and once the acute symptoms had subsided the antibiotic was stopped (normally for 2 to 3 days) and the group was then treated like the B subgroup for 7 days with 2 g/day of freeze-dried bacterial cells. The average treatment effects for each group over 10 days are shown in Table 26. This Comparative Example corresponds to Test Example 1 (Table 6) of Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2001-333766.
There are many theories regarding the mechanism of occurrence periodontal disease, but the consensus is that it occurs as a chronic inflammatory condition caused by an accumulation of plaque. Plaque is an aggregation of many types of bacteria that produce toxins which cause inflammation of the gums, and if this progresses the periodontal pockets between the teeth and gums are pushed open, halitosis occurs, and the supporting tissue of the teeth including the periodontal ligament and alveolar bone is destroyed. 0.80% of adults suffer to some degree from periodontal disease, which can spread to the surrounding teeth and result in tooth loss if left untreated, and it is recognized as a typical model of a disease which is still difficult to cure. The principal pathogens include Poryphyromonas gingivalis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Provoutel intermedia, Prevotella intermedia and the like, which do not produce toxins like food poisoning bacteria so that the disease progresses with few subjective symptoms and in many cases it is too late for treatment once it is diagnosed. Moreover, the oral cavity is constantly being contaminated by bacteria and provides a suitable environment for their proliferation, so that the problem continues to recur, and unfortunately there are few dentists who can reliably treat periodontal disease. The symptoms that occur when lesions develop deep in the gums and pus continues to seep out are similar to those of hemorrhoids, suggesting some kind of deep association in the occurrence of intractable infections at the entrance and exit to the digestive tract. Prevention and treatment of periodontal disease basically consists of the following. (1) As much as possible of the plaque and calculus (plaque residue) is removed by brushing, or more recently is destroyed and removed efficiently with ultrasound and lasers or dissolved with special chemicals (removal of bacterial bed). (2) A disinfectant, antibiotic or anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation is administered by injection into the periodontal pocket until the inflamed area improves, in an effort to suppress the inflammation. (3) However, when the site of inflammation is deep and treatments (1) and (2) above do not produce favorable results by themselves, the site of inflammation or damage is removed by surgery. (4) Subsequently, the gums are sewn up or reconstructed with artificial material. Recent attempts have been made to encourage regeneration of periodontal tissue by injecting drugs having enamel-forming proteins as their main components. (5) When all treatments are ineffective, the teeth are pulled and reconstructed. That is, the goal is to control inflammation of the gums, stop the progress of the periodontal disease, regenerate lost periodontal tissue, improve external appearance and maintain newly regained tissue.
20 periodontal disease patients were divided into 4 groups (A through D) with five people in each group, and once as much plaque and tartar as possible had been removed from all patients by scaling and root planning, the periodontal pockets were filled either with an antibiotic ointment or with freeze-dried bacterial cells of the present invention made into a gel with a small amount of water. In Group A, an antibiotic was used alone or together with an anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation as necessary. In Group B, a preparation consisting of a mixture of equal amounts of the antibiotic-resistant freeze-dried bacterial cells manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 and the antibiotic-resistant bacterial preparation manufactured in Manufacturing Example 3 was administered together with an antibiotic. In Group C, an antibiotic or anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation was administered initially, followed by the aforementioned bacterial preparation. In Group D, no antibiotic was used from the beginning, and only the bacterial preparation was administered. For purposes of treatment the principal causative bacteria were isolated and tested for drug sensitivity, and the appropriate antibiotic was selected in each case based on the results. The results are shown in Tables 27 and 28. As can be seen from Tables 27 and 28, administration of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention either alone or together with an antibiotic resulted in elimination of the causative bacterial in less than half a month even in cases of periodontal disease for which antibiotics or anti-inflammatory enzymes alone were expected to have very little effect, and with 1 to 2 months of continuous administration effects were achieved which could never have been achieved with conventional therapy, including elimination of bad breath and improvements in gum condition, the inside of the periodontal pockets and loose teeth, although with individual differences. Thus, the therapeutic effects of the original Lactobacillus casei strain as described in Comparative Example 2 below have been further improved upon, and dramatic effects on the thickness and firmness of the gum tissue of the periodontal pockets are worth noting.
8 periodontal disease patients were divided into 4 groups A through D, 2 patients per group, and Group A was given antibiotics alone or together with an anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation depending on symptoms. In Group B, a preparation consisting of a mixture of equal amounts of freeze-dried bacterial cells of the original Lactobacillus casei species manufactured by the methods of Manufacturing Example 1 and a bacterial preparation manufactured by the methods of Manufacturing Example 3 (both antibiotic resistant) was administered together with an antibiotic. In Group C, an antibiotic or anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation was administered initially, followed by the aforementioned bacterial preparation. In Group D, no antibiotic was used from the beginning, and only the bacterial preparation was administered. This Comparative Example corresponds to Test Example 2 using periodontal patients (patients suffering from alveolar abscess and gingivitis) in Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2001-333766, and the results are given in Table 29 (corresponding to part of Tables 7 through 10 in Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2001-333766).
A treatment test was performed for the chronic infections chronic sinusitis, chronic bronchitis and bed sores. Group A was given antibiotics alone or together with an anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation depending on symptoms. In cases of chronic sinusitis, the sinuses were generally washed with an aqueous solution of a suspended antibiotic preparation, while in cases of bed sores an antibiotic preparation was applied to the affected area after cleansing. The results of treatment are shown in Table 30. In Group B, a preparation consisting of a mixture of equal amounts of the freeze-dried bacterial cells (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 and the lactobacillus preparation (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 3 was administered together with an antibiotic. In cases of chronic sinusitis, the basic method of administering the lactobacillus preparation was by nasal lavage using a suspension of 2 g of freeze-dried bacterial cells in 1 liter of warm water. In cases of bed sores, the freeze-dried cells were wiped or scattered on the bed sores. The results of treatment are shown in Table 31. In Group C, an antibiotic was administered initially, either alone or together with an anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation, followed by the aforementioned lactobacillus preparation. The results of treatment are shown in Table 32. In Group D, no antibiotic was used from the beginning, and only the lactobacillus preparation was administered. The results of treatment are shown in Table 33. For purposes of treatment the principal bacteria causing the chronic infections were isolated and tested for drug sensitivity, and the appropriate antibiotic was selected in each case based on the results. As can be seen from Tables 30 through 33, strong therapeutic effects were obtained using the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention for chronic infections that are hard to cure with antibiotics. Combined use of an antibiotic with the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention, which has antibiotic resistance, was particularly effective. The results were even better than those obtained with the original Lactobacillus casei species as described below.
8 chronic sinusitis patients and 8 chronic bronchitis patients were each divided into 4 groups A through D, two people per group, and the A group was given an antibiotic alone or together with an anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation depending on symptoms. In Group B, a preparation consisting of a mixture of equal amounts of freeze-dried bacterial cells of the original Lactobacillus casei species manufactured by the methods of Manufacturing Example 1 and a lactobacillus preparation manufactured by the methods of Manufacturing Example 3 was administered together with an antibiotic. In Group C, an antibiotic was administered initially either alone or together with an anti-inflammatory enzyme preparation, followed by the aforementioned lactobacillus preparation. In Group D, no antibiotic was used from the beginning, and only the lactobacillus preparation was administered. This Comparative Example corresponds to Test Example 2 for chronic sinusitis and chronic bronchitis in Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2001-333766, and the results are given in Tables 34 and 35 (corresponding to part of Tables 7 through 10 in Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2001-333766).
20 g of a freeze-dried bacterial cell preparation (FERM BP-6971) manufactured by the methods of Manufacturing Example 2 mixed with 100 g of lactose was administered 2 g per day to patients suffering from chronic conditions which were not infections, including constipation, diarrhea, diabetes, a non-infectious disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, atopic dermatitis, low blood pressure, neurosis and high blood pressure. The administered dose of bacteria was 2 g/day at 1×1010 cells/g. In a treatment test of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443), the preparation was administered for 2 months to 10 patients each suffering from the same or similar symptoms, and the average improvement is shown in Table 36. About 15% of patients exhibited no improvement in symptoms even after receiving the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention, but in no case did the symptoms get worse. Effectiveness was also demonstrated to various degrees for many chronic conditions other than those shown in Table 36, including arteriosclerosis, gout, obesity and chronic hepatitis. As is clear from Table 36, if the effects of the lactobacillus preparation are achieved 100% without interference, the body's natural healing power is enhanced, and vitality is restored. For example, if the intestines are cleansed by internal administration, the blood is naturally cleansed so that hormones, enzymes, antibodies, immune substances and other essential substances are carried freely throughout the body, making metabolism smoother, improving systemic functions and allowing for a life untroubled by sickness. In truth, Metchinikoff's “prolongation of life” thesis has finally been realized after a century.
As shown in Example 16, good effects are achieved through suitable administration of this lactobacillus in the treatment of periodontal disease, but unfortunately this could not be called a cure depending on the progress of the periodontal disease. Consequently, the inventors showed as a result of exhaustive research that the effects could be improved through the application of the features of the bactericidal disinfectant as a pre-treatment, with the results explained below.
The affected areas of 5 patients suffering from shallow periodontal disease were washed with “this bactericidal disinfectant,” and then treated by injection of the “novel lactobacillus preparation” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4 into the affected area. The results are shown in Table 37.
Five patients suffering from shallow periodontal disease were treated by first disinfecting the affected areas with “the bactericidal disinfectant,” and then injecting a “novel lactobacillus preparation containing antibiotics” manufactured according to Manufacturing Example 5 into the affected areas. The results are shown in Table 38.
As a comparison, 5 patients each suffering from periodontal disease were treated with “this bactericidal disinfectant,” with the “novel lactobacillus preparation” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4, with the “novel lactobacillus preparation containing antibiotics” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 5 and with conventional therapy. The results are shown in Table 39.
When the periodontal disease was shallow, gum color, swelling and elasticity recovered within 2 to 3 weeks with conventional therapy and the pockets grew shallower but never closed. By contrast, when disinfection with “this bactericidal disinfectant” was combined with the “novel lactobacillus preparation” of the present invention, improvement was rapid from the beginning of treatment, swelling subsided rapidly, gum color and elasticity recovered greatly in about 2 weeks and the pockets gradually grew shallower, closing within about a month for a complete cure.
Five patients suffering from intermediate periodontal disease were treated by first disinfecting the affected areas with “this bactericidal disinfectant” and then injecting the “novel lactobacillus preparation” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4. The results are shown in Table 40.
Five patients suffering from intermediate periodontal disease were treated by first disinfecting the affected areas with “this bactericidal disinfectant,” and then injecting the “novel lactobacillus preparation containing antibiotics” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 5. The results are shown in Table 41.
As a comparison, 5 patients each with intermediate periodontal disease were treated with “this bactericidal disinfectant,” the “novel lactobacillus preparation” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4, the “novel lactobacillus preparation containing antibiotics” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 5 and conventional therapy. The results are shown in Table 42.
When the periodontal disease was intermediate, swelling subsided but color and elasticity were still unsatisfactory with conventional therapy, and while the pockets grew somewhat shallower and narrower, the change was not great. By contrast, when disinfection with “this bactericidal disinfectant” was combined with the “novel lactobacillus preparation” of the present invention, although progress towards a cure was slower than in the case of shallow periodontal disease, there was definite improvement and almost a complete cure within 2 to 3 months.
Five patients suffering from deep periodontal disease were treated by first disinfecting the affected areas with “this bactericidal disinfectant” and then injecting the “novel lactobacillus preparation” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4. The results are shown in Table 43.
Five patients suffering from deep periodontal disease were treated by first disinfecting the affected areas with “this bactericidal disinfectant,” and then injecting the “novel lactobacillus preparation containing antibiotics” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 5. The results are shown in Table 44.
As a comparison, 5 patients each with deep periodontal disease were treated with “this bactericidal disinfectant,” the “novel lactobacillus preparation” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4, the “novel lactobacillus preparation containing antibiotics” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 5 and conventional therapy. The results are shown in Table 45.
When the inflammation was deep, swelling, color, elasticity and other gum symptoms recovered slightly with conventional therapy, but the pockets were virtually unchanged, and the status quo was barely maintained. By contrast, when disinfection with “this bactericidal disinfectant” was combined with the “novel lactobacillus preparation” of the present invention, the gums began to improve after about 2 weeks of therapy with individual differences, and health was mainly restored in about 2 months. The pockets shrank slowly but steadily, to a few mm in about 3 months. Some patients remained in the same condition, while in other cases the pockets eventually closed for a complete cure.
Five patients suffering from end-stage periodontal disease were treated by first disinfecting the affected areas with “this bactericidal disinfectant” and then injecting the “novel lactobacillus preparation” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 4. The results are shown in Table 46.
Five patients suffering from end-stage periodontal disease were treated by first disinfecting the affected areas with “this bactericidal disinfectant” and then injecting the “novel lactobacillus preparation containing antibiotics” manufactured in Manufacturing Example 5. The results are shown in Table 47.
Five end-stage periodontal disease patients were treated with guided tissue regeneration using Emdogain, which has attracted interest as a cutting-edge existing therapy. The results are shown in Table 48.
When the periodontal disease was end-stage, it seemed to be too late for conventional therapy, and finally the teeth had to be extracted. Although the teeth could be supported surgically without being pulled, the disease then re-occurred, and in many cases extraction was only delayed. By contrast, with a combination of “the bactericidal disinfectant” and the “novel lactobacillus preparation” of the present invention it was possible to eliminate the pathogens and remove causative factors, producing a synergistic effect which led to tissue regeneration so that in 70 to 80% of cases extraction was unnecessary and the teeth were saved even if a complete cure was not achieved.
Two-month-old Landrace piglets with an average weight of 18 kg were divided into 3 groups of 10 male and 10 female piglets per group, and reared in individual, windowless pig houses ventilated by fans. The feed was standard pig feed (Nosan Corporation), supplied with feed always available in the feed bin, and water was supplied automatically through a water cup. The control group was given feed prepared with the original Lactobacillus casei (FERM BP-6971) while the test group was given feed prepared with the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention manufactured in Manufacturing Example 3 (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443), 1×106 wet cells/g of feed in each case, and no lactobacillus was given to the untreated group. After being reared for 1 month under these rearing conditions, as shown in Table 49 the piglets in the test group receiving the Lactobacillus casei of the present invention had better coats than those in the untreated group, and were an average of 4.8 kg heavier, indicating an obvious growth promotion effect. There were no signs of diarrhea or other symptoms common in piglets, and they showed no signs of illness after the test. There was also less fecal odor. Good results were also obtained in the control group, which was treated with the original Lactobacillus casei species, but to a lesser extent that in the test group. In a meat texture test by a specialist the quality in the test group was evaluated as extremely good, with a large amount of red meat and an elastic texture.
30 male and 30 female newborn chicks (mean weight 43 g) of a specialized broiler variety (Arbor Acre) were pre-reared for 3 days and divided into three groups with equal numbers of males and females in each group, and there was confirmed to be no variation in body weight with a mean weight of 50 g in each group. These were fed with standard starter feed for broiler fattening (Kyodo Shiryo, Golden G) for 4 weeks. Rearing was in crates until 4 weeks of age (insulated temperature 35° C.±2° C.). The control group was given freeze-dried cells of the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971) and the test group was given freeze-dried cells of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention manufactured in Manufacturing Example 3 (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) mixed with standard feed to 2×107 cells/g of feed in each case. The untreated group was given no lactobacillus. Water was supplied freely through a water feeder, while feed was supplied continuously with feed always available in the feed bin. The results are shown in Table 50, and it shows clearly that as a result of rearing for 4 weeks the control group exhibited about 15% and the test group about 27% greater weight gain than the untreated group. No sickness occurred in the test group during the rearing period, with no diarrhea symptoms and a reduction in fecal odor. This is further evidence that the effects of a lactobacillus preparation using the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention are much better than those of a lactobacillus preparation using the original Lactobacillus casei species.
Using 4 small-mesh fish pens stocked with 100 juvenile mackerel with a mean weight of 65 g, three fish pens were assigned to test groups and 1 to the untreated group. The fish were given moist pellets consisting of a 1:1 mixture of minced sardines and commercial yellowtail formula feed (Nisshin Feed, “Itomate”). In Test Group 1, the feed was mixed to 1×109 cells/g of feed with the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2, and given immediately. In Test Group 2, 0.02 ml/g of a culture solution of the same Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) of the present invention manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2 was added to the feed. In Test Group 3, 0.02 ml/g of culture filtrate of the same Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) of the present invention manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2 was added to the feed. The water temperature during the test period was 20° C. to 22° C. The results are shown in Table 51. As can be seen from Table 51, the mackerel in the test groups grew better than those in the untreated group, with less mortality during the test period. Of the test groups, the results were best for Test Group 2, which received a culture solution of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention.
The same test as in Example 29 was performed using the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971), with the results shown in Table 52. As shown in Table 52, the results were not as good as those obtained with the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention.
A feeding trial was performed using red worms, which are valuable as bird feed and fishing bait. Four wooden boxes of W 600 mm×D 400 mm×H 150 mm were prepared and filled to 80% with a mixture of 1 kg of leaf mold mixed with 0.5 kg of raw bread yeast, after which 100 juvenile red worms with a mean length of 10 mm and a mean weight of 40 mg were placed in each box. These were reared in a room set to a room temperature of 25° C., with 10 lux of illumination in the daytime and no light at night. Test Group 1 was sprayed with 0.01 g of wet cell bodies of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2, Test Group 2 was sprayed with 200 ml of a culture solution of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2 diluted 100× with water, and Test Group 3 was sprayed with 200 ml of culture filtrate of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2. This operation was performed once every 10 days, and the untreated group was sprayed with water. Each rearing box was sprayed with a suitable amount of water every other day so that the soil would not dry out. The worms were given dry yeast and chlorella as feed once a week, 1 g each at the beginning of rearing increasing 20% each week. The rearing results after 3 months are shown in Table 53. As shown in Table 53, the yield was better in Test Groups 1 and 2 than in the untreated group, and body weights were about 20% greater. The results for Test Group 3 were intermediate.
When feeding trials were also performed with juvenile beetles, silkworms and the like as well as red worms, those in the test groups grew faster and larger. In addition, the cocoons and adults were also larger. Good results were also obtained when the aforementioned tests were performed using the original Lactobacillus casei species, but growth rates and yields were 5 to 10% lower than with the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention.
Cucumbers were used to test prevention and treatment of powdery mildew and downy mildew, which are common problems in greenhouse cultivation. In powdery mildew disease the fungus invades from surface of the leaves and stalks, first forming white spots, but as the symptoms progress the leaf surfaces appear as if sprinkled with a white powder, gradually turning gray. Leaf growth stops, and in the case of cucumbers only small, thin hard cucumbers are harvested. In downy mildew disease, grayish-white mold-like spots first appear on the underside of the leaves, gradually forming irregular, dirty marks that continue to spread on the leaf surfaces. The leaves finally become yellow-brown and gluey and rot so that no harvest can be expected.
One section of a cucumber greenhouse was completely partitioned off, and 1 g of freeze-dried cells of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 mixed with 1 liter of water (2×107 cells/ml) was sprayed thoroughly on the leaves and stalks before flowering. One week later, spores of powdery mildew (Sphaeratheca fuliginea) and downy mildew (Pseudoperonospora cubensis) were applied in amounts sufficient to cause the diseases, but instead of getting sick the plants flowered and the resulting cucumbers were if anything better than normal. Cucumber plants to which the spores were applied without previous application of the lactobacillus of the present invention all developed the diseases. Some cucumber plants (10 to 20% overall) sprayed with freeze-dried cell bodies obtained from the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971) developed the disease, and in this case cucumbers could not be harvested.
When cucumber plants infected as described above were thoroughly sprayed at the earliest stage of infection with a solution (1×108 cells/ml) of 5 g of freeze-dried cells of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 suspended in 1 liter of water, and then sprayed with the same amount again a week later, the lesions gradually disappeared, flowering was normal, and fine cucumbers were obtained. When the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971) was applied in the same way, about 50% of the plants improved, but in the other 50% the diseases progressed and cucumbers could not be harvested.
Similar trials were performed using crops other than cucumbers including potatoes, peppers, pumpkins and the like, and in all cases application of freeze-dried cells of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention was shown to be effective. For example, good results were obtained when application of agricultural chemicals such as 3% thiophanate-methyl (Nippon Soda, Topsin-M) and quinoxaline (Yashima Chemical, Morestan) was reduced to ½ to ⅓, and a suitable amount of the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention was then applied.
Four planters of W 600 mm×D 400 mm×H 150 mm were prepared, 20 g of chemical fertilizer (NAC Co. #38, N: 8%, P: 5%, K: 5%) and 5 g of fused magnesium phosphate was mixed with the lowest layer of soil in each, and soil consisting of 10 g of magnesium lime (NAC Co., soil improver consisting of 5 to 7% magnesium oxide mixed with slaked lime) added to 10 L of a mixture of normal field soil with 30% leaf mold was laid on top to a depth of about 80%. In mid-August, 6 Allso strawberry seedlings were planted in each planter, and beginning two weeks later until mid-December, all the strawberry plants in the Test Group 1 planter were given liquid fertilizer each week and at the same time were sprayed thoroughly with freeze-dried cells of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) suspended 1×107 cells/ml in water. A 200× water dilution of culture liquid of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) was applied to Test Group 2. A 200× water dilution of culture filtrate of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention manufactured in Manufacturing Example 1 (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) was applied to Test Group 3. Water alone was applied to the untreated planter. In March of the following year, once buds had developed liquid fertilizer and the aforementioned lactobacillus preparation were applied once a week. Red, ripe strawberries were gradually harvested 1 to 2 months after flowering. The results are shown in Table 54. As shown in Table 54, the strawberries in Test Groups 1 and 2, which received the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention, not only grew more quickly, but 200 g of strawberries were harvested per plant. Moreover, they were all found to be of the first quality in terms of smell, color, taste and size. By contrast, fewer strawberries were harvested in the untreated group, and they were of average quality, inferior to the high-quality strawberries in the test groups.
Eight planters of W 600 mm×D 400 mm×H 150 mm were prepared, normal field soil was mixed with 30% leaf mold, and for the hornwort 8 g of magnesium lime (NAC Co., soil improver consisting of 5 to 7% magnesium oxide mixed with slaked lime) was added to 10 liters of this, and 1 week later the lower layer of soil in 3 planters was fertilized with 20 g of chemical fertilizer (NAC Co. #38, N: 8%, P: 5%, K: 5%). For the spinach, 20 g of magnesium lime was mixed well with 20 g of chemical fertilizer (NAC Co. #38, N: 8%, P: 5%, K: 5%) and added to 3 planters. Seeds were then planted in late September in the respective planters. When the hornwort and spinach sprouted they were thinned so that the leaves did not overlap, and once the main leaves began to develop they were fertilized once a week with liquid fertilizer and watered so that the soil did not dry out. When the liquid fertilizer was applied the plants in Group 1 were sprayed overall at the same time with freeze-dried cells of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2 suspended 1×107 cells/ml in water. The plants in Test Group 2 were sprayed in the same way with a 300× dilution of a culture liquid of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2. The plants in Test Group 3 were sprayed with a 300× dilution of culture filtrate of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) manufactured in Manufacturing Example 2. Water alone was sprayed in the untreated group. The results for hornwort are shown in Table 55. As shown in Table 55, the plants in Test Groups 1 and 2 which were treated with the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention grew quickly, with wide, thick and soft leaves, and smelled much better than commercial, hydroponically grown hornwort. Hornwort of intermediate quality was harvested from Test Group 3.
The results for spinach are shown in Table 56. As shown in Table 56, in the test groups the roots were redder and firmer than in the untreated group, and high quality deep green the leaves were produced which were large, thick and glossy, emitting a unique sweetness. Some of the plants in the untreated group developed leaf spot disease (in which brown spots appear on the leaves, blackish-brown mold develops on the spots and the plants wither), but this did not occur in the treatment groups. Comparative tests were also performed using vegetables such as cabbage, parsley and celery, fruits such as grapes and oranges, Basidiomycetes such as mushrooms, ornamental plants such as pothos and flowers such as carnations, and in all cases a higher-quality crop was harvested more rapidly than in the untreated group, with very little occurrence of disease.
Peppermint seedlings (with 6 leaves) were purchased, field soil was mixed with 50% leaf mold, Test Groups 1, 2 and 3 and an untreated group were established as in Examples 15 and 16 above, and the lactobacillus preparation of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443) was sprayed once a week. The plants were fertilized separately once a month. As a result, the peppermint in Test Groups 1, 2 and 3 had denser leaves than in the untreated group, with a strong, characteristically sweet smell. Tests were also performed using other herbs including chamomile, sage, lavender and lemon balm, but the characteristic smells of the herbs seemed stronger as in the case of the peppermint. The aforementioned tests with vegetables and herbs were also performed using the original Lactobacillus casei species (FERM BP-6971), which was used in Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2001-333766, but while the results were good, evaluating generally from yield, quality, smell, disease occurrence and the like they did not match the results obtained from application of the Lactobacillus casei species of the present invention (FERM BP-10059, FERM P-19443).
| 标题 | 发布/更新时间 | 阅读量 |
|---|---|---|
| 一种四氢嘧啶高产谷氨酸棒杆菌及其应用 | 2020-05-24 | 1 |
| 一种用蜜源菌制作天竺葵护肤酵素的方法 | 2020-11-16 | 0 |
| 农业废弃物饲料资源化利用的一种方法 | 2022-07-05 | 1 |
| 诊前病史采集方法及执行该方法的机器可读存储介质 | 2020-08-03 | 0 |
| 一种毛叶山桐子的组织培养育苗方法 | 2020-12-16 | 1 |
| 生物催化不对称还原制备(R)-邻氯扁桃酸甲酯的方法 | 2022-05-26 | 1 |
| 一种污泥发酵耦合生物脱氮系统 | 2020-05-29 | 2 |
| 一种红景天药物产品活性物的制备方法 | 2020-06-29 | 0 |
| 一种病死猪蝇蛆生态处理方法 | 2020-12-21 | 0 |
| 甘蔗脱毒健康种苗无菌外植体的制备方法 | 2020-10-31 | 0 |
高效检索全球专利专利汇是专利免费检索,专利查询,专利分析-国家发明专利查询检索分析平台，是提供专利分析，专利查询，专利检索等数据服务功能的知识产权数据服务商。
我们的产品包含105个国家的1.26亿组数据，免费查、免费专利分析。
专利汇分析报告产品可以对行业情报数据进行梳理分析，涉及维度包括行业专利基本状况分析、地域分析、技术分析、发明人分析、申请人分析、专利权人分析、失效分析、核心专利分析、法律分析、研发重点分析、企业专利处境分析、技术处境分析、专利寿命分析、企业定位分析、引证分析等超过60个分析角度，系统通过AI智能系统对图表进行解读，只需1分钟，一键生成行业专利分析报告。
