METHOD FOR RETRIEVING A FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT WITHOUT A RUNWAY |
|||||||
申请号 | EP00950213.9 | 申请日 | 2000-06-06 | 公开(公告)号 | EP1185457B1 | 公开(公告)日 | 2004-05-19 |
申请人 | The Insitu Group; | 发明人 | McGeer, Brian T.; Von Flotow, Andreas H.; Roesler, Cory; Jackson, Clifford; | ||||
摘要 | A method and an apparatus for capturing a flying object (5) are revealed. The apparatus includes a generally linear fixture (2), such as a length of rope; a means for suspending (1) the fixture (2) across the path of the flying object (5); and one or more hooks (19) on the flying object (5). The method involves suspending the fixture (2) such that its orientation includes a component normal to the flying object's line of approach; striking the fixture (2) with the flying object (5), which causes the flying object (5) to rotate and decelerate, while the fixture (2) slides along a surface of the flying object (5) into a hook (19); capturing the fixture (2) in the hook (19); and retrieving the flying object (5) from the fixure (2). | ||||||
权利要求 | |||||||
说明书全文 | The present invention addresses the problem of landing a small fixed-wing aircraft aboard a ship or in a space offering insufficient room for a runway, for example, on the roof of a building. The method involves the aircraft engaging a cable or cables held aloft by a kite, balloon, kite/balloon hybrid, aircraft, or mast. The aircraft is decelerated by the cable and then lowered to the deck. Operation of small unmanned aircraft may call for retrieval where space is insufficient for a normal landing run. e.g., aboard a boat. Current methods require the aircraft to fly into a net (e.g., U.S. Patents 4,056,247; 4,143,840; 4,456,205; 4,979,701; 5,109,788) or to deploy a parachute (e.g., U.S. Patents 3,980,259; 4,311,290; 4,753,400). Net techniques have disadvantages including: (1) difficulty of precise targeting, especially when the approach is through the turbulent wake of a ship's superstructure or when the ship is rocking, with associated high risk of damage if the aircraft enters the net incorrectly; (2) significant risk of damage even when the net entry is correct; (3) hazard to staff and equipment aboard ship; (4) complexity and cost of the net and associated apparatus; and (5) requirement for a large deck space. Parachute techniques have disadvantages including: (1) weight and complexity of equipment aboard the aircraft; and (2) difficulty of precise landing, and associated risk of damage. Further methods are known by which a hooked device provided distanced above an aircraft and connected to the aircraft catches a cable or a rod aligned horizontally in or perpendicular to the flight direction of the aircraft (e.g. US Patents 5,054,717; 1,383,595; 1,731,091; 1,716,670; 2,448,209; DE 43 01 671 A1; and GB 2 080 216 A). An object of the present invention is to improve upon current techniques in the following respects:
These improvements are realised through a combination of two distinct and novel concepts:
Use of these concepts is particularly applicable to small aircraft, i.e., weighing not more than a few tens of kilograms, since the size of the apparatus then becomes quite practical for routine use. This invention calls for a kite, balloon, or mast to hold aloft one or more cables, the suspension force on each cable being sufficient also to support the aircraft to be retrieved. The aircraft flies into the cable such that contact is made on the wing leading edge or other spanwise surface. As the aircraft moves forward against the cable, the contact force causes the aircraft to decelerate and rotate toward the cable; the cable meanwhile moves spanwise on the aircraft until it encounters one of a number of hooks. Each hook has a spring catch or like mechanism such that the cable is captured upon engagement and will not subsequently be released until the aircraft is retrieved. After the cable is thus captured, the aircraft continues to decelerate until it no longer has flying speed. Retrieval can then be effected by sliding the aircraft along the cable, or by reeling the cable itself to the retrieval area. More specifically, the present invention is a method and an apparatus for capturing a flying object as defined in claims 1 and 8, respectively. In preferred embodiments of the apparatus and method, the linear fixture is a cable or pole; the means for suspending the linear fixture is selected from the group consisting of a kite, a balloon, a kite/balloon hybrid, an aircraft, a mast and a crane; and the means for capturing the flying object is at least one hook on a surface of the flying object. In another preferred embodiment, the hook further includes a cleat or latch. The present invention will more fully be understood with reference to the attached drawings of example embodiments, in which:
The present invention reveals a method and an apparatus for capturing a flying object. The invention will more fully be described with reference to the following drawings. FIG. 1 shows a side view of a kite 1 anchored by its tether 2 to a boat 3, the tether 2 optionally being fitted with stops 4 at intervals along its length to prevent the aircraft 5 from sliding freely to the bottom of the tether 2 during capture. The aircraft 5 is brought aboard the boat 3 by lowering the kite 1. FIG. 2 shows a variation on the concept in which the kite 1 suspends a second cable 6 tensioned by a weight 7 (or alternatively by a sea anchor). This arrangement has the advantage that whereas the lift force generated by the kite 1, and therefore the tension in its tether 2, must be greater than the weight of the aircraft 5, in the second cable 6 the tension can be smaller. The decelerating force on the aircraft 5 scales approximately with the ratio of cable tension to cable length. Hence if the apparatus is sized for a predetermined maximum deceleration, the possibility of making the tension in the second cable 6 relatively low allows the kite tether 2 to be made shorter in the embodiment of FIG. 2 than in that of FIG. 1. A second advantage of the embodiment of FIG. 2 is that after capture the aircraft 5 can be brought aboard the boat 3 without lowering the kite, for example by reeling in a drawstring 10 to eliminate slack from the capture cable 6, and then, as shown in FIG. 3, by spooling the capture cable 6 around a pulley 8 attached to the kite 1. FIG. 4 shows a mast 9 suspending a capture cable 10 over the side of a ship 11. A spreader pole 12 holds the capture cable 10 in the desired position at deck level. The cable 10 slides through a guide on the spreader pole 12 into the water 13, where the weight and drag of a sea anchor, or simply a length of cable underwater, maintain cable tension. The aircraft 14 approaches off the side of the ship 11, and strikes the cable 10 on the fuselage or the leading edge of the wing. In either case, the cable 10 moves outward along the wing leading edge, causing the aircraft 14 to yaw toward the cable 10. and the cable 10 to slide into a hook on the wing. Several such cables may be suspended in order to maximize the probability of capture, with the cables spaced outward from the ship at intervals comparable to the wing span of the aircraft 14. FIG. 5 shows the aircraft 14 during deceleration, with its wing tip 15 hooked to the capture cable 10. The capture cable is made compliant, for example, by elastic cord or a constant-tension winch, in order to limit deceleration and dissipate the energy of the aircraft. Additional dissipation is provided by aerodynamic drag on the aircraft and cable, and by the drag of the cable 10 through the water 13. FIG. 6 shows retrieval of the aircraft 14 onto the ship 11. The spreader pole 12 is rotated alongside, and the aircraft 14 pulled aboard ship while the cable 10 is lowered from the mast 9. FIG. 7 shows the upper surface of a wing 16 designed to intercept a capture cable 17. Any number of capture hooks could be placed along the wing leading edge 18. In this embodiment only two such hooks 19 are installed at the wing tips. FIG. 8 shows the wingtip hook 19 in more detail. Many different designs could be used for the hook. Its essential function is to capture the cable 17 as it moves spanwise, and to prevent subsequent escape. Thus in this case, after making contact with the wing 16, the capture cable 17 slides outward along the leading edge 18 and strikes a gate 21 in the hook 19. The hook is spring-loaded into the forward position 19, but the cable 17 pulls the hook 19 around a hinge line 20. As the cable 17 continues spanwise it pushes through the gate 21 into a tapered slot 22 in the hook 19. The tapered slot 22 clamps the cable 23 in the manner of a jam cleat. Meanwhile the gate 24 springs back to the closed position so that the cable cannot escape. FIGS. 9 and 10 shows stages in an example of capture by a kite tether. At first contact, the aircraft 25 strikes the capture cable 26 at a point near the wing root 27. The aircraft in this example has a pusher propellor 28, and an inverted-vee tail 29 mounted on twin tailbooms 30. After contact, the aircraft begins to yaw, roll, and descend, while the cable slides outward along the wing leading edge, the aircraft and cable reaching the positions marked 31 and 32, respectively, at the moment of capture in a hook at the wing tip. The yaw and roll then increase, and for most of the subsequent deceleration the attitude of the aircraft is comparable to that in position 33. At low speed, the aircraft drops below the cable 34, until finally it is left dangling. The aircraft can then be retrieved. While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims. Thus, it is to be understood that variations can be made without departing from the novel aspects of this invention as defined in the claims. |