子分类：
| 序号 | 专利名 | 申请号 | 申请日 | 公开（公告）号 | 公开（公告）日 | 发明人 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | NETWORKED BATTLE SYSTEM WITH HEADS UP DISPLAY | US15165125 | 2016-05-26 | US20170010073A1 | 2017-01-12 | Warren Downing |
| A networked battle system includes a communication network, a first rifle and a sensor pack attached to the rifle that includes a sensor for determining a bearing of the first rifle, a sensor for an accelerometer and a rate gyroscope. The system also includes a communication element coupled to the rifle allowing the sensor pack to provide sensor information to the communication network, a battle management system in communication with the first rifle through the communication network that receives the sensor information from the sensor pack updates a battle plan based on the sensor information to form an updated battle plan and a heads up display unit at least in operative communication with the communication network and the communication element and that displays the updated battle plan to a user. | ||||||
| 102 | NETWORKED BATTLE SYSTEM OR FIREARM | US14481542 | 2014-09-09 | US20160377383A1 | 2016-12-29 | Warren Downing; David Walter Compton; Brenton Stewart Teed |
| A firearm includes one or more rails to which accessories may be mounted. The rails provide a communication path over which data may be transferred between the accessories and a processor located in the rails or in the firearm. The processor may cause the data to be sent to another location and may receive other data from other locations to provide a network of intercommunicating firearms that may deployed in a battlefield environment. | ||||||
| 103 | Autonomous weapon effects planning | US14011543 | 2013-08-27 | US09372053B2 | 2016-06-21 | Erwin M. De Sa; David K. Barnett; Jeffrey B. Saunders; David E. Bossert |
| A method for autonomous weapon effects planning includes receiving the desired lethality and collateral effects information on a target and autonomously selecting at least one weapon and fuze setting from an inventory of weapons based on the received lethality and collateral effects information. The method further includes autonomously; determining which weapon with fuze setting and terminal elevation and heading angles satisfies the desired lethality and collateral effects; shaping weapon trajectory to satisfy weapon maneuverability, terrain clobber avoidance and guidance requirements and planning weapon launch conditions for the one or more autonomously selected weapons. The weapon launch conditions include at least a launch point or a launch corridor. | ||||||
| 104 | MOBILE BALLISTICS PROCESSING AND TARGETING DISPLAY SYSTEM | US14676082 | 2015-04-01 | US20160091282A1 | 2016-03-31 | Joe D. Baker; Jeffrey P. Barstad |
| A mobile ballistics processing and targeting display system for receiving data associated with one or more ballistics variables, for processing such variables, and for displaying an intuitive targeting solution. One or more ballistics variables are inputted into a mobile computing device or are otherwise acquired by such device. Projected in-flight projectile characteristics are calculated by the computing device based upon ballistics variables. A mobile computer processing device having an image collection sensor and display mounted to an optical sight provides a user with the ability to easily view targeting solutions with reference to the sight picture viewable through the sight. The targeting solution displayed to the user is capable of continuous updating to account for changing environmental conditions affecting the calculation of a ballistics solution. | ||||||
| 105 | Reflexive response system for popup threat survival | US14135258 | 2013-12-19 | US09244459B2 | 2016-01-26 | Carl R. Herman |
| Methods and apparatus for assessing threats to a vehicle to facilitate a reflexive response. Threat timeline parameters for a detected threat to the vehicle including a threat mode and a time progression of the threat in the threat mode is determined based, at least in part, on a plurality of information sources. One or more candidate solutions for facilitating the reflexive response to the threat are determined based, at least in part, on the threat mode and the time progression and one or more of the candidate solutions are presented to an operator of the vehicle to enable the operator to mediate the threat. | ||||||
| 106 | Techniques Deployment System | US14313401 | 2014-06-24 | US20150369569A1 | 2015-12-24 | Seth L. Jahne; Blake Jeffrey Harnden; Eric R. Van Alst; James M. Chan; James M. Kalasky; Andrew Paul Riha |
| A method and apparatus for generating an effect. The apparatus comprises a group of tactical controllers and a mission controller. The group of tactical controllers control heterogeneous types of hardware to generate an effect for at least one of electronic warfare operations or cyber mission operations. A selected tactical controller in the group of tactical controllers controls a particular type of hardware using a technique that is specific for controlling the particular type of hardware to generate the effect. The mission controller identifies the effect for the selected tactical controller and assigns a task to the selected tactical controller. The selected tactical controller performs the task to control a particular type of hardware using the technique to generate the effect for at least one of the electronic warfare operations or the cyber mission operations. | ||||||
| 107 | METHOD AND SYSTEM OF MISSION PLANNING | US14399132 | 2012-05-11 | US20150316352A1 | 2015-11-05 | Jan Erik Eriksson; Kristian Lundberg |
| The present invention relates to a method and system for mission planning. The method comprises the steps of: —providing (805) information related to a target scene, said information comprising information related to a plurality of targets, —providing (810) information related to a plurality of resources for target attack, —determining (820) at least one possible attack direction against each target, —determining (830) a target effect associated to attacking the target from each of said determined at least one possible attack direction for each target, —forming (840) a network of possible routes between the targets for the resources, wherein the possible routes are determined based on the possible attack directions related to each target, and —forming (845) the mission plan for fighting the targets based on the determined target effects from the respective attack directions and based on the formed network of possible routes, wherein each target is fighted a predetermined amount of times. | ||||||
| 108 | AUTONOMOUS WEAPON EFFECTS PLANNING | US14011543 | 2013-08-27 | US20150059564A1 | 2015-03-05 | Erwin M. De Sa; David K. Barnett; Jeffrey B. Saunders; David E. Bossert |
| A method for autonomous weapon effects planning includes receiving the desired lethality and collateral effects information on a target and autonomously selecting at least one weapon and fuze setting from an inventory of weapons based on the received lethality and collateral effects information. The method further includes autonomously; determining which weapon with fuze setting and terminal elevation and heading angles satisfies the desired lethality and collateral effects; shaping weapon trajectory to satisfy weapon maneuverability, terrain clobber avoidance and guidance requirements and planning weapon launch conditions for the one or more autonomously selected weapons. The weapon launch conditions include at least a launch point or a launch corridor. | ||||||
| 109 | HARMONIC SHUTTERED SEEKER | US13923986 | 2013-06-21 | US20140374533A1 | 2014-12-25 | Todd Ell; Robert Rutkiewicz |
| A dual-mode, semi-active, laser-based and passive image-based seeker for projectiles, missiles, and other ordnance that persecute targets by detecting and tracking energy scattered from targets. The disclosed embodiments use a single digital imager having a single focal plane array sensor to sense data in both the image-based and laser-based modes of operation. A shuttering technique allows the relatively low frame-rate of the digital imager to detect, decode and localize in the imager's field-of-view a known pulse repetition frequency (PRF) from a known designator in the presence of ambient light and other confusing target designators, each having a different PRF. | ||||||
| 110 | METHOD FOR DUEL HANDLING IN A COMBAT AIRCRAFT | US14352131 | 2012-02-16 | US20140288907A1 | 2014-09-25 | Anders Lundqvist; Vibeke Kensing |
| The invention relates to a method for decision support of a first combat aircraft in a duel situation with a second combat aircraft. The method comprises the steps of: a) determining (3) a first plurality of combat value parameters of the first combat aircraft (1) and determining (3) a second plurality of combat value parameters of the second combat aircraft (2), wherein the second combat aircraft (2) is different to the first combat aircraft (1), b) analyzing (4) the first and the second plurality of combat value parameters determined in the previous step (step a)) by fitting the first and the second plurality of combat value parameters to a predefined model, and c) combining (5) the first plurality of combat value parameters analyzed in the previous step (step b)) to calculate a first value and combining (5) the second plurality of combat value parameters analyzed in the previous step (step b)) to calculate a second value, wherein the first value and the second value are compared to each other to determine the optimum success probability data of the first combat aircraft (1) and of the second combat aircraft (2) adapted for decision support in the duel situation. In this way, a reliable and fast tool for the pilot is provided while the tool is easy to handle and assists the pilot in order to make a quick and efficient decision in duel situations. | ||||||
| 111 | TEST AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR THREAT EVALUATION AND SENSOR/WEAPON ASSIGNMENT ALGORITHMS | US14241076 | 2013-03-25 | US20140200875A1 | 2014-07-17 | Inci Yuksel Ergun; Melih Gunay |
| The present invention relates to a system comprising threat evaluation and sensor/weapon assignment algorithm operating units which are adapted such that they will operate any threat evaluation and sensor/weapon assignment algorithm, a simulation and analysis unit which is adapted such that it will form the area, in which threat evaluation and sensor/weapon assignment algorithms will be operated, as a virtual scenario by forming an air picture in accordance with the data it receives, an external communication unit which is in communication with the simulation and analysis unit; which can communicate correspondingly with a threat evaluation and sensor/weapon assignment algorithm operating unit; which is adapted such that it will transfer the current scenario information to the threat evaluation and sensor/weapon assignment algorithm when it is necessary and transfer the engagement results to the simulation and analysis unit by taking them back, and a communication unit which is adapted such that it will transfer the scenario, which is formed by communicating with a client, to the client and will receive data through the client; and a method comprising the steps of sending and arranging the data to the simulation and analysis unit through at least one client, transferring the virtual scenario to the TESWA algorithm operating units and receiving the engagement data, combining the engagement data with each other and the data received from the clients and updating the scenario status, approving and disapproving the engagement, analyzing the engagement data and transferring the results to a client partially or completely. | ||||||
| 112 | Method and device for programming a projectile | US13563803 | 2012-08-01 | US08746119B2 | 2014-06-10 | Henry Roger Frick |
| An inductive or capacitative programming of a projectile is disclosed. A waveguide is used for the programming, the electromagnetic field being concentrated in the waveguide. The used programming unit includes at least one waveguide which is preferable located and/or integrated in the region of the muzzle, for example in front of the muzzle brake. A transmission coupler for the transmission is fed by a signal generator. The information relating to the projectile is modulated to the carrier frequency in the modulator. A reception coupler integrated on/in the projectile is electrically interconnected to a store or processor in the projectile. The reception coupler receives the modulated signal and transmits it to the processor which is where the eventual programming takes place. | ||||||
| 113 | WIDE AREA NEUTRALIZER | US14232286 | 2012-07-04 | US20140144311A1 | 2014-05-29 | Nahum Orlev; Alon Orlev |
| A weapon system includes a number of WAN components, each WAN component includes a warhead, a launch mechanism for launching the warhead, an aiming mechanism for aiming the launch mechanism to launch the warhead in a desired direction, and a controller that, upon receipt of a command to aim and launch the warhead, operates the aiming mechanism to aim the warhead in the desired direction and then operates the launch mechanism to launch the warhead. The weapon system also includes a WAN component deployment mechanism for deploying the plurality of WAN components in a defended area; and a command center for instructing the controller of one or more of the WAN components to aim and launch the warhead of the each WAN component at a target that has been detected in the defended area. | ||||||
| 114 | METHOD FOR WEAPON SYSTEM-TARGET PAIRING IN REAL-TIME | US13784764 | 2013-03-04 | US20140081608A1 | 2014-03-20 | Connor McLemore |
| Disclosed herein is an automated method for real-time pairing of weapon systems with targets. Databases are populated with inputs which include available weapon systems, targets, and threats. These inputs are entered into a table and the inputs in the table are pre-processed to create formatted data. An optimization engine is executed which analyses the model formulation, selects an algorithm then runs the algorithm. The optimization engine solution is processed into recommended weapon system-target pairings. These recommended weapon system-target pairings are received from the engine then displayed on a user interface. The populating, entering, pre-processing, running, receiving, and displaying are performed in real-time. | ||||||
| 115 | Methods and systems for threat engagement management | US12340495 | 2008-12-19 | US08563908B1 | 2013-10-22 | Carissa E. Lew; Moses W. Chan; Paul-Andre Monney; Paul M. Romberg; Leo J. Laux |
| Sensor(s) may be used to detect threat data. A processing system and/or a method may be used to fuse the detected threat data over time. Threat data may comprise information on a munition, missile, rocket, or nuclear/biological/chemical (NBC) projectile or delivery system. Detected threat data may be processed to create a target track-lethality list comprising the locations of any target(s) and a ranking of their lethality in comparison to decoys or chaff. The target track-lethality list may be used to create a target engagement-track list that matches available threat elimination resources (e.g. interceptors) to targets with a weapon-to-target assignment module. | ||||||
| 116 | Single click fire control and visualization for small unit operations | US13282998 | 2011-10-27 | US08505818B2 | 2013-08-13 | Darius F. Miller |
| A method for providing fire support command and control for small unit operations. The method involves displaying a geographical representation of a battle space using a map. One or more strike asset icons are displayed on the map, each representing strike assets which are geographically dispersed within the battle space. At least one target icon is also displayed on the map to represent a target within the battle space. In response to a user input identifying a desired effect upon the target, the system graphically conveys fire mission planning information to the user during an interactive mission planning process. | ||||||
| 117 | Extra-sensory perception sharing force capability and unknown terrain identification system | US13385039 | 2012-01-30 | US20130176192A1 | 2013-07-11 | Kenneth Varga; John Hiett |
| An occlusion or unknown space volume confidence determination, and planning system using databases, position, and shared real time data to determine unknown regions allowing planning and coordination of pathways through space to minimize risk. Data such as from cameras, or other sensor devices can be shared and routed between units of the system. Hidden surface determination, also known as hidden surface removal (HSR), occlusion culling (OC) or visible surface determination (VSD), can be achieved by identifying obstructions from multiple sensor measurements and incorporating relative position with depth between sensors to identify occlusion structures. Weapons ranges, and orientations are sensed, calculated, shared, and can be displayed in real time. Data confidence levels can be highlighted from time, and frequency of data. The real time data can be displayed stereographically for and highlighted on a display. | ||||||
| 118 | GUIDANCE METHOD AND APPARATUS | US13254738 | 2011-08-23 | US20130153707A1 | 2013-06-20 | Martin Simon Gate |
| A method of guiding a pursuer to a target is provided, and is of particular use when the possible target location is described by non-Gaussian statistics. Importantly, the method takes into account the fact that different potential target tracks in the future have significantly different times to go. That can give rise to emergent behaviour, in which the guidance method covers several possible outcomes at the same time in an optimal way. An example embodiment of the method combines Particle Filter ideas with Swarm Optimization techniques to form a method for generating guidance commands for systems with non-Gaussian statistics. That example method is then applied to a dynamic mission planning example, to guide an airborne pursuer to aground target travelling on a network of roads where the pursuer has no-go areas, to avoid collateral damage. | ||||||
| 119 | SINGLE CLICK FIRE CONTROL AND VISUALIZATION FOR SMALL UNIT OPERATIONS | US13282998 | 2011-10-27 | US20130105579A1 | 2013-05-02 | Darius F. Miller |
| A method for providing fire support command and control for small unit operations. The method involves displaying a geographical representation of a battle space using a map. One or more strike asset icons are displayed on the map, each representing strike assets which are geographically dispersed within the battle space. At least one target icon is also displayed on the map to represent a target within the battle space. In response to a user input identifying a desired effect upon the target, the system graphically conveys fire mission planning information to the user during an interactive mission planning process. | ||||||
| 120 | Hierarchical contingency management system for mission planners | US11059286 | 2005-02-16 | US08078319B2 | 2011-12-13 | Jerry L. Franke; Stephen M. Jameson; Rosemary D. Paradis; Robert J. Szczerba |
| A system controls a team of vehicles. The system includes a plan dependency identifier, a contingency monitor, and an alert formulator. The plan dependency identifier analyzes a mission plan and identifies mission constraints of the mission plan. The contingency monitor continuously reviews execution of the mission plan for violations of the mission constraints. The alert formulator determines whether a part of the mission plan is threatened by a violation of one of the mission constraints. | ||||||
QQ群二维码
意见反馈
意见反馈