BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to the art of recovering sulfur, and more particularly to a sulfur recovery process and apparatus for use in connection therewith.

PRIOR ART STATEMENT

It is old in the art to practice the Claus process by the use of feedback upstream of a flow of hydrogen sulfide (H₂ S) to vary the amount of air including oxygen (O₂) to react with the H₂ S in accordance with two variables (H₂ S and SO₂). This is disclosed in Robison U.S. Pat. No. 3,854,884 issued Dec. 17, 1974, and Robinson U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,904, issued Mar. 23, 1976. Both of these methods and systems involve a rather large time lag and error.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention an analog or digital open loop system is provided rapidly responsive only to one variable, viz. H₂ S, to control the amount of O₂ for creating a reaction to produce elemental sulfur.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

In the accompanying drawing which illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the present invention:

The FIGURE is a block diagram of apparatus to convert H₂ S to elemental sulfur.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The Claus process is the process used to manufacture sulfur from acid gas--gas containing 15-80% hydrogen sulfide. Nearly 40% of the sulfur produced in the United States in 1977 was manufactured by the Claus process. The feed stock for the Claus process comes mainly from the "waste" stream from natural gas and petroleum processing. The recovery of sulfur from these streams converts what could constitute a nuisance into a viable economic by-product.

The Claus process operates on two reactions. The first is the oxidation of one-third of the H₂ S with a limited quantity of air to form sulfur dioxide (SO₂).

H2 S+3/2 O2 →SO2 +H2 O

The second reaction is the catalytic reaction of the remaining H₂ S with the SO₂ to form sulfur and water.

2H2 S+SO2 →3S+2H2 O

The efficiency of the process is dependent on the 2.0 hydrogen sulfide to the 1.0 sulfur dioxide ratio. An increase in that ratio to 2.1 causes a reduction in the theoretical efficiency from 100% to 97%. Therefore, to maintain peak efficiency in a plant, that ratio and, therefore, the air flow to the process must be controlled. The only instrumentation currently on the market, however, is a very expensive ($25-$30 thousand dollars) system manufactured by DuPont.

Further, this system is not always dependable. Because of this, most plants assume a given acid gas H₂ S concentration and control the air flow on the acid gas flow and suffer the consequential efficiency variations. In rural areas, reduced efficiencies might be acceptable, but in areas of air pollution consciousness they are not acceptable because the unreacted sulfur compounds end up in the process flue gas.

As stated previously, a ratio control instrument based on the analysis of the process tail gas by coulometric titration was developed. These sulfur analyzers were ideal for monitoring the tail gas because the other sulfur compounds present did not interfere with the analysis. However, because the concentrations were still in the 1-2% range, dilution sampling was necessary, and because the tail gas contained quantities of molten sulfur droplets, the sampling probes continually fouled up.

Because of the large capacity of these plants and the small residence times (30-45 seconds), there is always the question of how well a feedback type system can control the process. The answer to that question really resides in the variability of the acid gas concentration. It will work for long period variations, but not for short.

The present invention involves an open loop system based on controlling the air to the process by measuring the flow and concentration of the incoming acid gas. Because the acid gas concentrations can reach as high as 80% H₂ S, an open loop system is not readily amenable to titration analysis because the high dilutions which would be required cannot be done reliably. However, if we are not constrained to titration analysis, there are other modes of analysis which can be used. Chromatographic analysis as well as optical analysis, can perform these analyses. The optical analyses, both infrared and ultraviolet, are the preferred methods since they are simple, fast and continuous and can handle the high sulfur concentration directly.

In the infrared, H₂ S absorbs weakly at about 2.6 and 3.9 μm. That these bands are weak could be an advantage in measuring at these very high concentrations. It is also fortunate that other compounds likely to be present do not absorb in this region.

Hydrogen sulfide also absorbs strongly in the ultraviolet between 195 and 230 nanometers. The strength of this absorption will require short path lengths to get a suitable analysis, but this could also be an advantage because several conventional liquid chromatographic ultraviolet analyzers are available. They could provide an inexpensive detection and analysis source.

A typical open loop system (the present invention) is that shown in the FIGURE. The flow of acid gas is measured, as is its H₂ S concentration, yielding a measure of the mass flow of H₂ S into the process. These measurements might be handled by a microprocessor controller for control, or perhaps better, trim control of the process air.

An outstanding advantage of an open loop system for Claus process control is that it would be a more rapid, more responsive control than a feedback system. A feedback control could be very slow. Another advantage is that the open loop system can be made in a less expensive manner. The single point optical H₂ S analysis is simpler than the two point coulometric analysis. In all, the open loop method is a simpler, less involved method of control.

The process of the present invention may be practiced by the use of an extremely large number of widely differing equipments. The one shown in the FIGURE is just one of many possible examples of such equipments. The purpose of the said one equipment is to take one mole out of each three moles of H₂ S in acid gas entering plant 10 via conduit 11 and to oxidize with 1.5 moles of oxygen thus:

H2 S+3/2O2 →SO2 +H2 O           (1)

The SO₂ is sulfur dioxide and the H₂ O is water.

The oxygen is supplied in air from a source 15 through a conduit 16, a needle valve 17 and a conduit 18. The amount of oxygen is changed with detected mass flow of H₂ S in conduit 11 via electrical input lead 19 to needle valve 17.

Plant 10 has two sections 12 and 13. In section 12, the reaction of equation (1) is produced. In section 13, the following reaction is produced:

2H2 S+SO2 →3S+2H2 O                  (2)

The term 3S in equation (2) thus represents elemental sulfur (S). Sulfur is thus reduced or eliminated in outlet conduit 14 to prevent air pollution or for other recovery purposes if the outlet conduit 14 should dump directly into the atmosphere.

Note will be taken in equation (2) that the 2H₂ S is the two-thirds of the H₂ S after the one-third (H₂ S) is oxidized in equation (1).

The water is harmless from a pollution standpoint.

Note also that the sulfur dioxide (SO₂) molecule in (1) is exactly the same molecule that appears in equation (2).

Plant 10 is shown diagrammatically in the FIGURE. The products of combustion of the H₂ S are preferrably fully formed before they enter section or chamber 13. Section 13 may be a conventional reactor-coalescer and/or other conventional structure as desired.

Although the present invention does not employ feedback control of oxygen, open loop control thereof is provided by measuring the H₂ S flowing in conduit 11.

Needle valve 17 may be similar to or identical to needle valve 37 shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,854,884.

As stated previously, the amount of oxygen in conduit 18 is solely controlled in accordance with the amount of H₂ S in conduit 11. Thus this differs from the prior art because in the prior art the 2H₂ S and SO₂ in equation (2) are each measured and the O₂ varied to cause the ratio of 2 moles of hydrogen sulfide to be left with one mole of SO₂.

If the H₂ S mass flow rate is m_b in conduit 11 and an O₂ mass flow rate is m_a in conduit 18, ##EQU1##

The numbers of equation (3) are derived from the following:

______________________________________ELEMENT      ATOMIC WEIGHT______________________________________Hydrogen      1Sulfur       32Oxygen       16______________________________________ A mole of H2 S is thus 2 + 32 = 34 grams. ##STR1## See equation (1).

Thus, the stoichiometric ratio to oxidize only one-third of the H₂ S is: ##EQU2##

Compare equation (3) with equation (7).

The mass flow rate m_a, in one way, can be determined by the input signal to needle valve 17 over lead 19 in accordance with: ##EQU3## where m_a is in pounds per unit time,

K is a constant,

y is the fraction of H₂ S in inlet conduit 20, in mole percent

F is the total volume rate of flow through conduit 11 (see output lead 21 of flowmeter 22) in, e.g. cubic feed per hour,

P is the gage pressure within conduit 20,

T is temperature (e.g. in degrees Fahrenheit) within conduit 20,

P_o is, for example, 14.7 psi or ambient air pressure,

T_o is, for example, 460 degrees (T+T_o is in degrees Rankine).

Thus P+P_o is absolute pressure and T+T_o is absolute temperature.

Due to the fact that P_o and T_o are constant, ##EQU4##

The structures shown in the FIGURE perform source or arithmetic functions all by means which are individually old but are new in combination.

All the structures shown in the FIGURE are analog sources or analog computers except perhaps for plant 10, needle valve 17 and air supply 15.

In the FIGURE there is provided a pressure source 23 to produce an analog signal on lead 34 proportional to P. An analog temperature source 24, an H₂ S analyzer (analog source) 25, adders 26 and 27, P_o and T_o analog sources, analog dividers 28 and 29, and analog multipliers 30, 31 and 32.

Source 24 produces an analog output signal on lead 33 proportional to T in inlet conduit 20 in, for example, degrees Fahrenheit.

Source 23 produces an analog of gage pressure within conduit 20 on output lead 34.

H₂ S analyzer 25 produces an analog in mole percent of the H₂ S in conduit 20. This analog appears on output lead 35.

Analyzer 25 may be conventional and of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,796,887, if desired. Preferably infrared is employed. The analysis wavelength would preferably be 2.635 microns and the reference wavelength would preferably be 2.94 microns. Also, an incandescent source would be used with an infrared sensor. The probe would also be closed.

The stoichiometric amount of air or O₂ for each pound of H₂ S would be about 25.3 standard cubic feet.

If desired, in equation (9), the units of F may be cubic feet per hour, P_a may be in pounds per square inch absolute, and T+T_o and T_a may be temperature in degrees Rankine. m_a may be in standard cubic feet of air per hour if K_o is another constant.

Source 24 may include a conventional Wheatstone bridge type of circuit if desired.

Adder 27, divider 29, and multipliers 30, 31 and 32 are connected in succession in that order from source 24 to needle valve 17 via lead 19. Lead 19 is connected from the output of multiplier 32 to needle valve 17.

Adder 26 and divider 28 are connected in succession in that order from source 23 to an input lead 36 of multiplier 31.

P_o is supplied to adder 26 and divider 28. T_o is supplied to adder 27 and divider 29.

Lead 35 is connected to one input of multiplier 30.

Adder 26 has an output lead 37.

Adder 27, divider 29, multiplier 30 and multiplier 31 have respective output leads 38, 39, 40 and 41.

The following leads carry signals proportional to the values indicated below:

______________________________________Lead              Value______________________________________34                P37                P + Po 36              ##STR2##  33              T38                T + To   39              ##STR3##   40              ##STR4##   41              ##STR5##   19              ##STR6##______________________________________

The constant K may be adjustable with a variable resistor or otherwise to vary the gain or the like of an amplifier in multiplier 32 or in any other conventional way.

OPERATION

Needle valve 17 in the FIGURE is controlled by the signal on input lead 19 thereto to a valve such that m_a in equation (8) is accurate for the current magnitude of the terms on the right hand side of the equation.

The left end of inlet conduit 20 may be connected to, if desired, the H₂ S output of any number of such sources including but not limited to an amine desulfurization plant for sour gas or from a refinery or as illustrated on page 724 (FIG. 561) of a bound volume of the Air Pollution Manual, Second Edition, published by the Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C., May, 1973. Plant 10 may, if desired, be of the type illustrated in the same book identified in the immediately preceding sentence at page 728 therein in FIG. 564.

Conduit 20 may contain acid gas including H₂ S emanating from the said amine desulfurization plant. Acid gas from an amine desulfurization plant may typically contain 65 mole percent H₂ S, 33 mole percent CO₂, and 2 mole percent hydrocarbons.