FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to semiconductor memory circuits which have the capability of retaining stored information even after electrical power to the circuit has been removed.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Semiconductor memories can be classified as volatile (where stored information is lost upon power removal) and non-volatile (where stored information is maintained after power removal, and which can be accurately retrieved upon subsequent power-up). Several types of non-volatile semi-conductor memories are known, notably based on MNOS transistors, FAMOS transistors, or FATMOS transistors. A description of prior MNOS and FAMOS memory circuits is given in U.S. Pat. No. 4,132,904. The latter patent, together with U.K. Specification No. 2,000,407 describe and claim FATMOS non-volatile latch memory circuits.

The FATMOS is basically a control gate plus floating gate MOS transistor with a portion of the floating gate lying close to the semiconductor substrate. When the source and drain connections are connected to an appropriate potential (one positive relative to the other) and a suitable potential of a first magnitude applied to the control gate, the transistor conducts. Upon removal of the control gate potential, conduction ceases. If a potential of a second and higher magnitude is applied to the control gate with the drain at zero voltage, the transistor again conducts, but in addition electric charges tunnel between the floating gate and the transistor substrate through the portion of the floating gate closest to the substrate. This charge remains on the floating gate even when the control gate potential is removed and increases the switching threshold of the device. This charge on the floating gate enables the transistor to be employed in a non-volatile memory, as described in U.K. Specification No. 2,000,407. The switching threshold of the FATMOS is returned to its original level by applying between the control gate and drain a potential of approximately the second and higher potential, but of opposite sign.

In a typical example of an N-channel enhancement-type FATMOS, the area of the floating gate closest to the substrate overlies the drain of the transistor, although this is not essential and the area closest to the substrate can be elsewhere on the transistor. In normal, non-volatile operation of a latch including such a FATMOS device, a voltage of typically +5 to +7 volts is applied to the control gate of the FATMOS. To write non-volatile information into the latch, a voltage of typically +8 to +15 volts is applied to the control gate of the FATMOS. If power is removed from the latch and then subsequently restored, it settles into a logic state dictated by its state during the earlier non-volatile write operation. In fact, the logic state it settles into is opposite to the state which existed at non-volatile write.

Although FATMOS transistors work well when employed in non-volatile memory cells (see U.K. Specification No. 2,000,407) they can sometimes be unpredictable during power-up after the FATMOS's have been placed in their non-volatile mode (higher threshold state). This unpredictablity manifests itself by the FATMOS transistor(s) switching to the wrong state (i.e. a FATMOS with a charge retained on its floating gate being held "off" instead of "on" and vice-versa). The explanation for this appears to arise from the processing conditions employed to produce the N⁺ diffusion areas. These have a higher capacitance per unit area than other semiconductor areas, and the consequence is that the device has more nodal capacity to the negative supply line than the positive line. If, for example, one examines the CMOS non-volatile memory cell illustrated in FIG. 2a of U.S. Pat. No. 4,132,904 (which employs a pair of FATMOS drivers in a cross-coupled latch configuration), the capacitance which exists between N1 and N2 to the more negative supply rail (V_SS) is greater than the corresponding capacitance to the more positive supply rail V_DD. Thus, when the cell is switched on after the FATMOS transistors (Q₂ and Q₄) have been placed in their varied threshold states, the P-channel complementary driver or load transistors (Q₁ and Q₃) switch on faster than the FATMOS devices. They will thus make a decision regarding conduction states ahead of the FATMOS devices. The latter transistors may therefore possibly be driven into the incorrect states and are thus incapable of steering the latch into its correct, non-volatile memory state.

The present invention is concerned with reducing this unpredictability during non-volatile read and is also concerned with enabling the non-volatile information written into the memory to be recovered without the need for the cycle of removing and then restoring the power to the latch.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention reduces such unpredictability as described by precharging the nodes of the latch at the commencement of a non-volatile read to a logic state such that, when the precharge signal is removed, the FATMOS devices switch ahead of the non-variable threshold transistors in the latch. They will thus dictate, by means of their different thresholds, the correct logic state into which the latch should settle.

According to the invention there is provided a non-volatile bistable semiconductor latch having a pair of cross-coupled branches connectable across a common supply voltage, each branch including a complementary driver or load and a driver connected in series at a respective node, at least one of said complementary drivers or loads, or drivers, including an insulated gate field effect transistor (IGFET) having a threshold voltage which may be varied by raising its gate potential above a predetermined level relative to the potential on one of its other electrodes, whereby volatile information stored in said latch is rendered non-volatile by increasing said gate potential above said predetermined level, and means for precharging both said nodes to an identical logic state such that, when the precharge signal is removed, at least one variable threshold IGFET switches in a direction to place the latch in the correct logic state dictated by an earlier non-volatile storing operation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Preferred features of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, given by way of example, wherein:

FIG. 1 is an electrical circuit diagram of a first embodiment of the invention, and

FIGS. 2 and 3 are circuit diagrams of a second embodiment of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring first to FIG. 1, there is shown a CMOS non-volatile latch circuit having P-channel complementary drivers (or loads) Q₁, Q₂, N-channel drivers constituted by FATMOS devices Q₃, Q₄ and read/write control N-channel MOS transistors Q₅ and Q₆. The control gates of the transistors Q₁ to Q₄ are cross-coupled to the nodes of each opposite branch of the cell, such nodes being indicated as X₁ and X₂. Transistors Q₅, Q₆ link the latch to DATA and DATA lines for information input/output and are controlled by an ADDRESS signal as shown. The notional capacitances between the nodes and the supply rails V_DD, V_SS are indicated by dashed lines and capacitors C₁ to C₄. As so far described, the cell is identical to that illustrated in FIG. 2a of U.S. Pat. No. 4,132,904 and U.K. Pat. Specification No. 2,000,407, and thus a detailed description of its volatile and non-volatile operational states will not be given here--the reader being referred to either of the referenced patent specifications for details.

Before describing the inventive aspects of FIG. 1, the possible unpredictability of the circuit will be explained. At power-up, which is required for a non-volatile read operation, the FATMOS devices Q₃ and Q₄ will have different thresholds as a consequence of the charges stored on the floating gates from an earlier non-volatile write operation. This characteristic should therefore force the latch into an unambiguous memory state upon power-up. However, as has already been explained, the N⁺ diffusion areas have a high capacitance per unit area and thus C₁ >C₂ and C₃ >C₄. When is applied to the cell, V_DD separates from V_SS and because of the capacitance ratios mentioned, the nodes X₁ and X₂ initially lie close to V_SS (the negative supply rail). This turns the P-channel transistors Q₁, Q₂ on and tends to hold the FATMOS drivers Q₃, Q₄ off. The nodes commence moving towards the positive supply rail voltage, V_DD, and at some point one of the nodes must give up so that the latch settles into a stable logic state (one node being "0", the other being "1"). Ideally the different thresholds of the FATMOS transistors should determine this end result, but because these devices are initially nearly off, the stable latch state can be dictated by the slight differences between the two P-channel transistors Q₁, Q₂. The latch may therefore settle into a stable logic state not dictated by the FATMOS devices.

Reverting now to the inventive aspects of the circuit shown in FIG. 1, this unpredictability is removed by adding P-channel transistors Q₇, Q₈ in parallel with the P-channel complementary loads Q₁, Q₂ and by adding N-channel transistors Q₉, Q₁₀ in series with the FATMOS loads Q₃, Q₄. The control gates of these transistors are operated by a common control signal designated NVR.

Assume now that non-volatile information has already been written into the latch as previously described. To read this information, rather than removing and then restoring the power to the latch, a negative signal pulse is applied to the NVR terminal. This immediately turns on Q₇, Q₈, turns off Q₉, Q₁₀, and causes both nodes X₁, X₂ to go positive. At this stage the FATMOS devices Q₃, Q₄ are on, but are isolated from the negative supply rail V_SS, and Q₁, Q₂ are held off. When the NVR signal is removed, Q₇, Q₈ commence to go off, Q₉, Q₁₀ commence to go on, and the nodes X₁, X₂ start to descend towards the negative supply voltage. At this time, also, the FATMOS devices Q₃, Q₄ start to switch on, but due to their variable thresholds one turns on faster than the other and dictates the stable state into which the latch settles. In this manner, the FATMOS transistors have maximum effect during this unstable period and the capacitance effects described are negated. A further advantage of precharging the latch nodes positively at a non-volatile read operation by means of the NVR signal is that the non-volatile stored information can be recovered at any time independently of the power supply switch on. Not only is this more convenient, but also enables design constraints on the power supply to be reduced. Reading can occur repeatedly (to bring back the previously non-volatile written information) without requiring power switch-off each time.

If desired, Q₉ and Q₁₀ may be combined into a single device per memory cell, or per column of n cells, or even a single device for a complete memory array. It is also possible to precharge X₁ and X₂ via Q₅ and Q₆ from the DATA and DATA lines (the latter two lines both being forced high). In such circumstances transistors Q₇ and Q⁸ would be unnecessary and additional logic controlled by NVR would be needed to force DATA and DATA lines high.

Furthermore, in practice Q₃ and Q₄ may need to be provided with series and/or shunt transistors to maintain correct logic levels.

The cell shown in FIG. 1 has a CMOS configuration with FATMOS N channel drivers and with the nodes X₁, X₂ precharged positively. The converse configuration (with FATMOS P channel drivers) is also possible, with the nodes X₁, X₂ precharged negatively.

A second embodiment of the invention is illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, wherein a non-volatile read operation by means of the NVR signal is employed in a non-volatile D-type set-reset master-slave flip-flop. The logic circuit for the flip-flop is shown in FIG. 2 with the usual symbols for the AND, OR, NAND and NOR gates, and with the D-input signal D, set signal S, reset signal R, and clock signal CK. The master flip-flop is shown within the dashed box, supplying outputs M, M to the slave flip-flop below the dashed box. The latter flip-flop has outputs Q, Q which are inverted to provide final outputs Q₀, Q₀.

Only the master flip-flop need be non-volatile and it receives the NVR signal for non-volatile reading as shown. The detailed circuit for the master flip-flop is shown in FIG. 3, and although it is drawn slightly differently from the latch shown in FIG. 1, it functions similarly thereto. It includes complementary drivers (or loads) Q₁, Q₂, FATMOS drivers Q₃, Q₄, and non-volatile read transistors Q₇ to Q₁₀. Load transistors Q₁₁, Q₁₂ are provided in series with the FATMOS drivers Q₃, Q₄. The various transistors to enable the flip-flop to function in a logically correct manner (e.g. with S or R signals) are also shown. During both reading and writing operations the clock input CK must be held low so that the data in the master flip-flop is transferred to the slave flip-flop.

To write non-volatile information into the D-type, the CK input is held low and V_DD raised from its normal +5 volts to about +12 volts (typically for 50 μsec). This alters the thresholds of the FATMOS drivers Q₃, Q₄ as has been previously described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,132,904 and U.K. Patent Specification No. 2,000,407. To read this information out of the D-type, the NVR signal is applied as has previously been described for the FIG. 1 embodiment. Typically the NVR signal is about 5 volts negative for a few microseconds. The master flip-flop settles into a stable state dictated by the previous non-volatile write operation and this, with the clock input CK held low, is transferred to the slave flip-flop and presented as outputs Q₀, Q₀. It will be appreciated that the non-volatile read operation causes the master flip-flop to settle into a logic state opposite to that written in during non-volatile writing.